tags 439642 -patch thanks On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 05:51:10AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Why the hell is a package containing .so an Architecture: all package?!
It seems to have been an omission in moving the /usr/lib contents from snort-common to the snort binary packages. > I'd also advise to use ???-module -avoid-version??? to build plugins, no > need to have .0.0.0 things for them, but please fix that bug first. Why shouldn't there be a versioning for the modules? If libraries are in a separate package (as they should be) versioninig might be appropiate. > An NMU might happen before monday since there's an ongoing BSP. And where's the patch? Regards Javier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
