On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 16:11 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > severity 441946 serious > thanks > > Hi Adam, > > I think this should be of serious severity, as having two packages share > files without declaring appropriately is a severe policy violation. In > particular, it might be better not to have a version not upgrading > cleanly in testing. > > Please revert the severity setting in case you disagree.
If it's a policy violation, then there's nothing to agree or disagree about that. It's clear this is not a grave bug (the original severity of the second of these), as it does not render the package unusable, but I was not aware of any policy violation. It's just been NMU'd anyway, so it's moot for this package, but I'd appreciate a pointer to the policy section if you get a minute. Thanks, -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting using open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
