reopen 439478 thanks On 25/08/07 at 08:31 -0700, Ivan Kohler wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:29:28AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Package: libpam-unix2 > > version: 2.1-4 > > Severity: serious > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs > > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > > > > Hi, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > > i386. > > > > Relevant part: > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libpam0g-dev (>= 0.81), autoconf, > > libtool, libxcrypt-dev, dpatch > > Checking for already installed source dependencies... > > debhelper: missing > > Using default version 5.0.53 > > > libpam0g-dev: missing > > Default version of libpam0g-dev not sufficient, no suitable version found. > > Skipping for now, maybe there are alternatives. > > > > [...] > > > > After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied: > > > > libpam0g-dev(inst 0.79-4 ! >= wanted 0.81) > > Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping libpam-unix2 > > Please fix your build scripts to not report FTBFS errors on packages > that have not had their Build-Deps fulfilled in the first place. > Thanks.
That's exactly the problem: the package can't be built in unstable, because you build-depend on an unavailable package (to be precise: an unavailable version of an available package). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
