On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 07:50:37PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: gsnes9x > Version: 3.12-7 > Severity: serious
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > Automatic build of gsnes9x_3.12-7 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 27 > [...] > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > > Build-Depends: libgnome-dev, debhelper, gettext, autotools-dev, > > automake1.7, libgtkxmhtml-dev, libzvt-dev, snes9x-x > [...] > > E: Package snes9x-x has no installation candidate > > Package snes9x-x is not available, but is referred to by another package. > > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > > is only available from another source > > apt-get failed. > > Package installation failed > [...] > According to packages.debian.org, snes9x-x is a package in non-free. <sigh> This was not a bug; gsnes9x should *not* be built on s390, because snes9x-x is not ported to s390. This build failure was the intentional result of the -7 upload, and there is nothing wrong with contrib packages that build-depend on non-free packages. Alain, I'll approve -8 for sarge, but it's much less work for you in the long term if you don't have to re-upload gsnes9x's source every time snes9x-x adds/removes an architecture to its own port list. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature