Sorry, I don't understand your latest change of traceroute
2.0.7-3 regarding #436698:

Current version (2.0.7-3) of traceroute provides:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  1349 2007-08-08 22:10 /usr/bin/tcptraceroute*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 38624 2007-08-08 22:10 /usr/bin/traceroute*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    10 2007-08-09 16:20 /usr/bin/traceroute6 -> 
traceroute*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    10 2007-08-09 16:20 /usr/bin/tracert -> traceroute*

So you are pointing /usr/bin/traceroute6 to /usr/bin/traceroute.
But the ndisc6 package provides the following:

,---- [ ndisc6-0.9.3/debian/ndisc6.postinst ]
| update-alternatives \
|         --install /usr/bin/traceroute6 traceroute6 /usr/bin/rltraceroute6 110 
\
|         --slave /usr/share/man/man8/traceroute6.8.gz traceroute6.8.gz 
/usr/share/man/man8/rltraceroute6.8.gz
`----

So as soon as I install ndisc6 I'll get the following setup (having
current traceroute installed as well):

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  1349 2007-08-08 22:10 /usr/bin/tcptraceroute*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 38624 2007-08-08 22:10 /usr/bin/traceroute*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    29 2007-08-09 16:21 /usr/bin/traceroute6 -> 
/etc/alternatives/traceroute6*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    10 2007-08-09 16:20 /usr/bin/tracert -> traceroute*

Now when I remove ndisc6, /usr/bin/traceroute6 does *not* exist
anymore. Bug in ndisc6?

But: current version (3:20070202-2) of iputils-tracepath (which
traceroute 2.0.7-3 conflicts with) provides:

-rwxr-xr-x root/root      7632 2007-07-16 18:00 /usr/bin/tracepath
-rwsr-xr-x root/root     11960 2007-07-16 18:00 /usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
-rwxr-xr-x root/root      8716 2007-07-16 18:00 /usr/bin/tracepath6

Why shouldn't traceroute and iputils-tracepath play together using
the alternatives mechanism for /usr/bin/traceroute6, as well as
playing together with ndisc6?

It would be great if all the existing trace* packages in Debian
(like iputils-tracepath, tcptraceroute, traceproto, traceroute and
traceroute-nanog) would play together smarter, using alternatives
where appropriate and necessary. Maybe you could coordinate that?

thx && regards,
-mika-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to