Your message dated Tue, 03 May 2005 23:42:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for 
libluminate.so.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2005 15:59:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 03 08:59:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DSzo6-0004lj-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 08:59:34 -0700
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
j43FxVXE020520
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
        Tue, 3 May 2005 08:59:31 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j43FxVjH020518;
        Tue, 3 May 2005 08:59:31 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 08:59:31 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: illuminator
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: Policy 3.3

illuminator fails to build from source ons parc, duplicated on sparc
pbuilder.


dh_installdeb -a
dh_shlibdeps -a
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code (132)
dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/illuminator-demo/usr/bin/tsview-ng' 
gave error exit status 1
dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 256
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307502-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 03:43:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 03 20:43:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DTAn7-0006Xh-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 20:43:18 -0700
Received: from doorstop.home.net 
(c-24-60-135-62.hsd1.ma.comcast.net[24.60.135.62])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <20050504034242016002jvode>; Wed, 4 May 2005 03:42:47 +0000
Received: from hazelsct by doorstop.home.net with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DTAmA-0000e8-Vt; Tue, 03 May 2005 23:42:19 -0400
Subject: Re: Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for
        libluminate.so.6
From: Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 23:42:18 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 23:08 -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
> 
> > 2.6.8-6 is in sarge, my kernel is/was out of date on that box.  (I just
> > installed 2.6.8-6, it will be active next reboot.)
> 
> Good to know. I've just tested the build with kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64
> (version 2.4.27-9) from sid and even though the warnings are still there, 
> it does not FTBFS anymore:
> 
> [...]
> dh_makeshlibs -a
> dh_compress -a
> dh_fixperms -a
> dh_installdeb -a
> dh_shlibdeps -a
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
> dh_gencontrol -a
> dh_md5sums -a
> dh_builddeb -a
> dpkg-deb: building package `libluminate-dev' in 
> `../libluminate-dev_0.9.1-1_sparc.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building package `libluminate6' in 
> `../libluminate6_0.9.1-1_sparc.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building package `illuminator-demo' in 
> `../illuminator-demo_0.9.1-1_sparc.deb'.
> 
> For the record, the following (or later) kernel versions (both currently 
> in sarge) are required for the builds to succeed:
> 
> kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 version 2.4.27-2
> kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64  version 2.6.8-6

Terrific, thanks for the detailed investigation.  I'm glad to hear that
it works!  I hope the buildd will be updated to use this kernel to avoid
breakage of other packages.

Cheers,

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!
http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to