Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xearth: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2005 17:21:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 10:21:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c158131.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.158.131] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DQ7H3-0004MW-00; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:21:33 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DQ7H4-0002kR-Ud; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:21:34 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xearth: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:21:34 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xearth
Version: 1.1-10
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge

When building 'xearth' in a clean 'testing' chroot,
I get the following error:

dh_clean
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
xmkmf
make: xmkmf: Command not found
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 127


The new version in sid fixes this by adding the missing Build-Depends
on xutils in debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306308-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2005 21:47:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 30 14:47:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DRzns-0007Dt-00; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:47:12 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 2D205172843; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:47:10 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xearth: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'xutils'
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The version of xearth which fixes this bug has reached testing; closing
accordingly.

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCc/zZKN6ufymYLloRAtupAKClr9punfvNGkU1WMdgvkfBqGzmpACcCxdc
ynXlL8hN0YNGflb/TOT9BnA=
=qGMD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--R3G7APHDIzY6R/pk--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to