On 03/06/07 at 01:38 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:26:29AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 02/06/07 at 23:17 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Hi Lucas, > > > > This was a bug in linux-libc-dev that has since been fixed. > > > Actually, the bug in linux-libc-dev was #423462, but it was about > > LINUX_VERSION_CODE, not UTS_RELEASE. The full content of > > /usr/include/linux/version.h in linux-libc-dev is: > > > #define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132629 > > #define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c)) > > > So maybe UTS_RELEASE should be added to that file, and those bugs should > > be reassigned to linux-libc-dev. I've stopped filing bugs about those > > issues in the meantime.
Actually: <waldi> UTS_RELEASE is not defined in version.h any longer. this is not a bug in the kernel <waldi> linux/utsrelease.h is the correct header now -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
