On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 12:46:23PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote: > > Well, then you must depend on that. In fact, devfsd was being > > installed in the same apt-get run, but hadn't yet been configured. So > > it existed on the system but wasn't setup. > > > > You must either depend on it or not require it. > > So then what am I supposed to do about this in devfsd when it's > a missing dependency in lvm-common?
I don't understand the question. I'm saying, if you require devfsd to be present and configured before configuring lvm-common, then lvm-common should depend on devfsd. In my case, simply not installing devfsd at all solved the problem. I can't say whether the problem is with devfsd or lvm-common. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
