Your message dated Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:32:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414820: FTBFS: Depeneds on non-existant version of
libnfnetlink-dev (>= 0.0.25)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libnetfilter-conntrack
Version: 0.0.50-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Only libnfnetlink 0.0.16 is in the archive, libnetfilter-conntrack
depends on >= 0.0.25
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* Alexander Wirt [Wed, 14 Mar 2007 06:10:09 +0100]:
> Benjamin Seidenberg schrieb am Dienstag, den 13. März 2007:
> > Package: libnetfilter-conntrack
> > Version: 0.0.50-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Only libnfnetlink 0.0.16 is in the archive, libnetfilter-conntrack
> > depends on >= 0.0.25
> 0.0.25 is, due to a soname bump, currently in NEW... So we have to wait for
> this.
This bug was left unclosed, which prevents migration to testing. Closing
it now if that's okay.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Luis Eduardo Aute - Aleluya nº 1
--- End Message ---
