On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 07:59 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> And that, together with removing jadetex, solved your problems, although > >> the message from color.sty (No driver specified), correct? > > > > I first made the installs mentioned above on another box not having > > jadetex installed. Later I did the same on the one with jadetex after > > removal of jadetex and docbook-utils: "dpkg -r jadetex docbook-utils" > > > > After that I hold the texlive-base-bin package. No luck with the > > texlive-base or texlive-base-bin version 2007-8 on either boxes. Have > > not tried with 2007-9 versions. Should they work? > > All texlive versions should work as soon as the conffiles are present - > in other words, in case the buggy tetex-base has been purged, as soon as > the list of texlive packages mentioned earlier has been installed with > force-confmiss. > > Do I understand correctly that upgrading to the latest texlive packages > in sid still doesn't work on your system? This means that either some > conffiles are still missing, or that there is yet an other bug. > > If upgrading really still fails, can you please send the error message > and the temporary file, if applicable?
I have now upgraded to tetex-base-bin 2007-9 and tetex-base 2007-7 after restoring the conffiles. I assume the other packages will install properly too, will do that now. What puzzles me is that restoring the conffiles did not succeed with 2007-8 and 2007-7, respectively, I had to go back to 2007-7 and 2007-6 to do so. The other packages had to be downgraded due to dependencies. Will report if any new errors occur, otherwise all is fine with me regrading this bug report. > > After this I successfullly reinstalled jadetex (3.13-8) and > > docbook-utils (0.6.14-1), but removing them in the first place does not > > seem necessary, since version 3.13-8 is dated May 2. > > What do you infer from the date of jadetex? Nothing, I saw that -8 is the new version even since it is dated May 2. Maybe you also saw the -7.1 works, at least with base-bin-7 and base-6. > Regards, Frank