On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:03:10PM +0000, Daniel Franganillo wrote: > 2007/5/28, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >You appear to be replying to the bug closure message > > resulting from the upload of samba 3.0.25a to Debian unstable, but you > > reported that you were running the version of samba from stable. > I just replied to the last message received in the bug report. > > > Our Gentoo boxes run flawless with the patch. > > With which patch? There are several floating around, including two > > different patches against 3.0.24 included in the upstream bug report. What > > we really need to know is if the packages at > > <http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/samba/> fix this bug or not, so that we > > know whether we need to use the other upstream patch for the updated > > security release. > Please, read carefully my previous message. Your message did not say that you were testing the etch3 binary packages. I see that the reportbug information included in your report mentions the etch3 version number, ok. I'll advise the security team to scrap the current build and will reroll with the full upstream patch. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
