-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 08:55:01 +0200,
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Arnaud,
Yo Andreas,
[...]
> At least this particular bug occurs on all arches. It is not very nice
> to have to read, understand and manually change 'debian/rules' and
> maybe some other files to get a package built. In particular, this makes
> any kind of autobuilding impossible, which is a bad thing from a
> security point of view - and also inconvenient, of course.
I can understand but I still don't think it's that serious.
> For the Java related packages, the {sun,ibm,blackdown}-j2sdk1.x packages
> which can be created by make-jpkg from 'java-package' make it easy to
> set up an autobuilder, as long as all packages support this by setting
> the correct JAVA_HOME directories and by specifying the correct
> Build-Depends.
I must admit I'm more focused on moving java packages to main than
supporting non-free jdk's ;-)
> Anyway, I will file those problems as 'wishlist' in the remaining cases.
Many thanks.
> Some other types of bugs like
>
> "'Missing Build-Depends on 'junit'" or
> "'./debian_patch' not executable"
>
> also appear on all arches including i386. I think those are 'serious'
> FTBFS bugs, even for packages in 'contrib'. What should be done with
> those?
You are right, those are really serious! and should be corrected asap!
Also, I really appreciate you provide patches when you file bugs, please
continue to do so! :-D
>> Any way, I leave all the bug you reported and will try to upload fixes
>> as soon as possible.
>
> Thank you for all the fixes to my reports which you already uploaded
> and for your work in general!
Thanks ;-)
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCcMQ04vzFZu62tMIRAi6hAJwLv5acbcIf5oVjThpuPUIspxWrlwCgt/Z7
uIDwtXbqbu9TTSvhfCu+tDo=
=0oV5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
