Your message dated Sat, 12 May 2007 11:49:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423472: Uninstallable: depends on libgcc1 and libstdc++6
from experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: smc
Version: 0.99.6-1
Severity: serious
smc depends on the libgcc1 and libstdc++6 from experimental, making it
uninstallable in unstable. smc needs a rebuild against the gcc in unstable.
- Josh Triplett
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-josh (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 19:56:26 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Package: smc
> Version: 0.99.6-1
> Severity: serious
>
> smc depends on the libgcc1 and libstdc++6 from experimental, making it
> uninstallable in unstable. smc needs a rebuild against the gcc in unstable.
>
AFAIK this can be handled by a binary NMU, thus Cc:ing Steve, and
closing the bug.
Steve, can you schedule a binNMU of smc on i386? I checked that smc's
dependency on smc-data is versioned with = ${source:Version}, so this
should work.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
