Your message dated Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:40 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306380: fixed in leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 08:16:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 01:16:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ajg222.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (angband) [83.16.240.222]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQLEs-0005E9-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:16:14 -0700
Received: from kilobyte by angband with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DQLEp-0002hq-Nj
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:16:11 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: leafnode: postinst adds spurious lines to /etc/inetd.conf
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:16:11 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: leafnode
Version: 1.11.0.rel-1
Severity: normal
Every time postinst is called (including upgrades), a new entry is added to
/etc/inetd.conf. update-inetd will catch this problem, and ask the
following question:
,-====
| Setting up leafnode (1.11.0.rel-1) ...
|
| WARNING!!!!!! /etc/inetd.conf contains multiple entries for
| the `nntp' service. You're about to disable these entries.
| Do you want to continue? [n]
`-====
Upon answering "n" (default), you'll be left to deal with the problem
yourself, upon answering "y", update-inetd will make sure only one entry is
enabled, leaving older ones disabled. This will cause cruft to accumulate.
The extra configure-time question will also break hands-off
installs/upgrades.
Regards,
1KB
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages leafnode depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpcre3 4.5-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii logrotate 3.7-2 Log rotation utility
ii netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii tcpd 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrapper utilit
-- debconf information:
leafnode/expireinfo:
leafnode/purge: false
* leafnode/update-groups: false
* leafnode/network: permanent
* leafnode/server: news.tpi.pl
leafnode/update-maxcount:
leafnode/update-groupinfo:
leafnode/tcpd: true
leafnode/ppp:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306380-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 21:08:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 14:08:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQXHu-0000zs-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:08:10 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQXCa-0001kX-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:40 -0400
From: Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#306380: fixed in leafnode 1.11.1.rel-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:02:40 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: leafnode
Source-Version: 1.11.1.rel-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
leafnode, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/leafnode/leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1.diff.gz
leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/leafnode/leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1.dsc
leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/leafnode/leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1_i386.deb
leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/l/leafnode/leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1_powerpc.deb
leafnode_1.11.1.rel.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/leafnode/leafnode_1.11.1.rel.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated leafnode package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:44:42 +0100
Source: leafnode
Binary: leafnode
Architecture: source powerpc i386
Version: 1.11.1.rel-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Desription:
leafnode - NNTP server for small leaf sites
Closes: 303157 306380
Changes:
leafnode (1.11.1.rel-1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* New upstream release.
* Upstream has fixed the pluralisation of the articles posted count message
in fetchnews (closes: #303157).
* Version 4.21 of netbase broke our usage of update-inetd by tightening up
some overly broad regular expressions: fix it by specifying the comment
string when (re)adding. (closes: #306380).
* Fix a similar update-inetd problem in postrm by adding wildcards.
Files:
7164ed7ff4e77b7b5f0fa29ce104823c 594 news extra leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1.dsc
b3b16ec72ed1c43c4d4e6d6e8ab4f069 466707 news extra
leafnode_1.11.1.rel.orig.tar.gz
f460493df33f9cff696b7c48e4b41d83 36503 news extra leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1.diff.gz
0517147522d02dbed82d250c7c36d22e 331950 news extra
leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1_powerpc.deb
a13f1a5c7545dccd5839e6385b0c3711 311002 news extra
leafnode_1.11.1.rel-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCbqZZJ2Vo11xhU60RAuGNAJ9iD0qov0P2Cyqug5qo/WgB6lXGXwCgrRIa
2O/iRWwVkyfAp0l5VetbsU8=
=AzxL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
