clone 422387 -1 reassign -1 texinfo severity -1 important notfound -1 2006.03.17+dfsg1-3 found -1 4.8.dfsg.1-4 retitle -1 texinfo: Should Suggest texlive-generic-recommended thanks
Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > I had a similar bug report on one of my packages, changing the build-dep >> > from tetex to texlive, texlive-generic-recommended was all it took to fix >> > this. >> >> That's true. However, it would be much better to ask upstream to change >> from epsf.tex to graphicx.sty. For LaTeX documents, epsf.tex has been >> obsolete for about 13 years... > > The culprit is texinfo.tex, which is shipped in the octave* and > octave*-packages and includes epsf.tex. Even the most recent upstream > version of this file [1] includes epsf.tex. I think that graphics.sty would > not work with texinfo, because it is TeX rather than LaTeX. That's correct - I must apologize for not looking closely at the build log. And actually it shouldn't be the responsibility of a package which uses texinfo to figure that out. It makes sense that texinfo only Suggests: a TeX system, but it should really suggest what it actually needs. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
