>>>>> "JCGS" == Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JCGS> I am still not sure about binary named changed.
Neither am I.
JCGS> I think you should provide a link to the old binary name, as
JCGS> if you don't do that installations in which the old name will
JCGS> break silently, which is a bad thing.
What I'm afraid of is that new CRM114 users could start use the wrong
binary name, thus forcing the package to carry cruft forever. And it
would mean introducing the cruft into stable Debian version (crm114 is
not present in woody).
Providing a warning during installation or making the link optional
looks like overkill to me.
Making /usr/bin/crm114 a wrapper script providing some warning may be
dangerous.
Making just the crm114 link and add a big warning in README.Debian
probably doesn't solve the problem since most users don't read
README.Debian files I guess. But this could make a nice excuse for
me :-) when the link gets removed sometimes in the future, so this is
what I'm most likely to do.
Any better suggestion?
JCGS> About the css files being full, I have tested and with the
JCGS> new version, after running cssutil -b spam.css (which was the
JCGS> full file) I got a lot of empty slots, and things seem to be
JCGS> working again.
OK, thanks for testing. IIRC, there were some microgrooming related
bugs in older CRM114 versions, maybe this was one of their
manifestations.
Regards,
Milan Zamazal
--
http://www.zamazal.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
