Your message dated Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:57:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Upgrading from woody to 2.2.23-0.pre4 fails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2005 21:07:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 08 13:07:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tms.rz.uni-kiel.de [134.245.11.89] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D8lvn-0000e2-00; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:07:56 -0800
Received: from amavis by tms.rz.uni-kiel.de with scanned-ok (Exim 4.34)
        id 1D8lvI-0004o6-Hm
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:07:24 +0100
Received: from zaphod.gpi.uni-kiel.de ([134.245.120.1])
        by tms.rz.uni-kiel.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
        id 1D8lvG-0004ny-Il
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:07:22 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=stargate.galaxy)
        by zaphod.gpi.uni-kiel.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1D8lvG-0001vL-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:07:22 +0100
Received: by stargate.galaxy (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 5351918934; Tue,  8 Mar 2005 22:07:21 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:07:21 +0100
From: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Upgrading from woody to 2.2.23-0.pre4 fails
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12 (Uni-Kiel/tms)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-0.pre4
Tags: experimental
Severity: grave

Upgrading from woody fails because of at least two problems:

- The shell function move_old_database_directory_away is not found in
  postinst
- An old slapd.conf is incorrect because attribute=... is used instead
  of attrs=...

        Torsten

--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCLhQIdQgHtVUb5EcRAqoEAKCBLBJCWdBPwDrrqnNotWQwDS8jzQCfQgYL
oLtkki4yANhnGRxtleISFiM=
=Dk2g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298614-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2005 08:57:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 01:57:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DOtyQ-0002Sf-00; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:57:18 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 5EE251727F1; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:57:17 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Upgrading from woody to 2.2.23-0.pre4 fails
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a+b56+3nqLzpiR9O"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--a+b56+3nqLzpiR9O
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

These particular upgrade issues seem to be resolved now in unstable <yay!>;
there may be others, but I don't see much point in keeping a grave bug open
here when the particular issues mentioned have been fixed.

Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--a+b56+3nqLzpiR9O
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCaLxsKN6ufymYLloRAoVOAJ4gZdXvTwsRZSyxnKorZ4nNappBZACfYIAu
oFF5ue9ayxHv+PwQ9kzdNUE=
=yJ+6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--a+b56+3nqLzpiR9O--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to