Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:36:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line blitz++: FTBFS on sarge: Missing build dependency.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2005 18:36:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 16 11:36:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DMs9A-0001lo-00; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:36:00 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id D7CA238053
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:35:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
        by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C590D38161
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:35:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
        id A478F26136; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:35:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 20:35:59 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: blitz++: FTBFS on sarge: Missing build dependency.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: blitz++
Version: 1:0.8-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge

Hi,

Your package is failing to build in sarge.  This seems to be
caused by a missing build dependency on g77.  This seems to be
added in a later version but that version didn't make it in sarge
yet.

This is the error I get:
checking for g77... no
checking for pgf77... no
checking for fort77... no
checking for Fortran 77 compiler default output file name...  configure: error: 
Fortran 77 compiler cannot create executables


This bug can be closed when the new version reaches sarge.


Kurt


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304953-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2005 05:36:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 21 22:36:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DOqpx-0001rL-00; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:36:21 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 1C375172A6E; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:36:20 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: blitz++: FTBFS on sarge: Missing build dependency.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

blitz++ 1:0.8-4 has reached sarge, so this bug is no longer an issue.

Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCaI1QKN6ufymYLloRAkNsAJ9BCQOesLeP+XFBXWbwR5qvN8yndQCgyp2j
qmts3qszQiqaoIxYVbKzIJg=
=4pMY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DocE+STaALJfprDB--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to