Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:50:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2003 22:18:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 17:18:19 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp7.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0203.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.29]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19LViy-0002m4-00; Thu, 29 May 2003 17:18:16 -0500
Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (unknown [81.51.28.201])
by mwinf0203.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A040A1000147
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 30 May 2003 00:18:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19LW7X-0005LO-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 30 May 2003 00:43:39 +0200
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 00:43:39 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xdelta2 retrieve does not work
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-Cc: Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-29.8 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,HAS_PACKAGE,IN_REP_TO,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
USER_AGENT_MUTT,X_DEBBUGS_CC
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: xdelta2
Version: 2.0-beta10-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sid upstream
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:31:31PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Hi, i just had a bit of a play with xdelta2, was trying to compare it to
> xdelta, it looks like you can check files in, but cannot remove them.
Ah, that looks like a bug. I can reproduce it With the volume created
by the /usr/share/doc/xdelta2/examples/script-insert script, and I can
even create a bigger error when specifying the MD5 digest to extract:
/tmp[1374]$ xdelta2 xversions test.volume test.archive
INFO [xdfs] Version Length MD5
INFO [xdfs] 0 16651 25f2a361bd66009fd6978164e319e5fe
INFO [xdfs] 1 1977 1dcf802461e44d280d1cb857c2b643ec
/tmp[1375]$ xdelta2 retrieve test.volume test.archive 0 foo
XDFS-ERROR: Invalid version label: should be number or digest value: 0
DBFS-ERROR: abort [TXN not active] (1 active)
XDFS-ERROR: command failed: Invalid argument
/tmp[1376]$ xdelta2 retrieve test.volume test.archive
25f2a361bd66009fd6978164e319e5fe foo
** ERROR **: file xdfs_cpp.h: line 665 (class TXN & NODEBASE<MAJOR_DESC>::txn()
const): assertion failed: (_txn)
aborting...
Abandon (core dumped)
Now all operations fail with:
/tmp[1377]$ xdelta2 retrieve test.volume test.archive 1 foo
DBFS-ERROR: crashed process PID 20434: xdelta2 retrieve test.volume
test.archive 25f2a361bd66009fd6978164e319e5fe foo
DBFS-ERROR: at least one process has crashed: please killproc and run recovery
PROP-ERROR: check_recovery: Database requires operator attention
XDFS-ERROR: command failed: Database requires operator attention
If I attempt recovery:
/tmp[1388]$ xdelta2 recover test.volume
DBFS-ERROR: crashed process PID 20434: xdelta2 retrieve test.volume
test.archive 25f2a361bd66009fd6978164e319e5fe foo
DBFS-ERROR: 1 active processes still exist: stop these first
PROP-ERROR: check_recovery: Database requires operator attention
XDFS-ERROR: command failed: Database requires operator attention
And well, PID 20434 is not here any more !
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
Pro: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratuity
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 195317-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2005 11:50:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 12 04:50:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLJue-0002SR-00; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:50:36 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 4FDB964D43; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:50:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8F98F4F88B; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:50:23 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:50:23 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4
This package has been removed because it is buggy and no longer
maintained upstream.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
