On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:18:27AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: > Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > You list sites that are not be be accessed; the default action (for > > images, e.g. banners from doubleclick.net) is to replace the image that > > should have been fetched with the transparent 1x1 image. By putting your > > own banner there, you don't have unexpected white areas.
yep. Before putting wwwoffle behind privoxy I used to have a 1x1 *red* dot there, to spot too invasive sites... some used that same imgs to paint whole areas - the result was funny ;). Not sure this looks like a config action, though the config file offers to name the url. So perhaps one should not change those from the pkg, but add his own and put a proper url in the config. > >> > Replacing the wwwoffle.conf with a symlink would seem pretty silly > >> > anyway, and I wonder as to what extent such actions need to be > >> > supported. > >> > >> I do it, and I do it with many files. Obviously others have noted this, > >> too. > > > > Please enlighten me, why? What are the advantanges? > > I switch network configurations for my laptop during boot time by > redirecting symlinks to the correct target for the current network. I right. Tools for wanderers let you define profiles like a set of configs, that get symlinked to 'standard' places at system/net reconfig. The advantage is, that changing current config will change the config in the profile, no need to resync then. -- paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
