Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:17:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line oops, this has already been fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 18:58:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 04 11:58:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DIWmU-00077z-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:58:38 -0700
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
        by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DIWmU-00086X-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:58:38 -0600
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
j34593XE003587
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
        Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:09:03 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j345932Q003585;
        Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:09:03 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: jadetex: install fails [sparc]
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:09:03 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: jadetex
Version: 3.13-4
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable

Trying to build linphone on my sparc pbuilder, jadetex failed to
install.  Install also failed on the sparc buildd build of linphone.

Setting up jadetex (3.13-4) ...
Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
Checking for TeX memory dumps (.fmt) ...
   done.
Creating JadeTeX memory dumps ...
/usr/share/texmf/tex/jadetex/config/jadetex.ini
kpathsea: Running mktextfm ecrm1000
mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; inpu
t ecrm1000
This is METAFONT, Version 2.7182 (Web2C 7.4.5)
kpathsea: Running mktexmf ecrm1000
mktexmf: /var/cache/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/ecrm1000.mf: successfully generated
.

(/var/cache/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/ecrm1000.mf
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exbase.mf)
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/ecrm.mf
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exroman.mf
 Ok (/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exaccess.mf
 Ok) (/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/expseudo.mf
 Ok) (/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exruwest.mf
 Ok [192] [193] [194] [195] [196] [197] [198] [199] [200] [201] [202] [203]
[204] [205] [206] [207] [208] [209] [210] [211] [212] [213] [214] [215]
[216] [217] [218] [219] [220] [221] [222] [223])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exrlwest.mf
 Ok [224] [225] [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233] [234] [235]
[236] [237] [238] [239] [240] [241] [242] [243] [244] [245] [246] [247]
[248] [249] [250] [251] [252] [253] [254] [255])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exrueast.mf
 Ok [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139]
[140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151]
[152] [153] [154] [155] [156] [157])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exrleast.mf
 Ok [158] [160] [161] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166] [167] [168] [169] [170]
[171] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] [178] [179] [180] [181] [182]
[183] [184] [185] [186] [187] [188])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exbraces.mf
 Ok [94] [126] [23] [40] [41] [60] [124] [62] [91] [93] [92] [123] [125]
[95] [127] [32]) (/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/expunct.mf
 Ok [14] [15] [19] [20] [13] [18] [33] [39] [42] [43] [44] [46] [47] [58]
[59] [61] [96] [189] [17] [45] [16] [21] [22])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exaccent.mf
 Ok [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exsign.mf
 Ok [24] [34] [35] [36] [37] [64] [191] [159])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exrlig.mf
 Ok [25] [26] [28] [27] [29] [30] [31])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exromp.mf
 Ok [38] [63] [190]) (/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exrulett.mf
 Ok [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78]
[79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exrllett.mf
 Ok [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108]
[109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120]
[121] [122]) (/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exrdigit.mf
 Ok [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57])
(/usr/share/texmf/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/exrligtb.mf
 Ok) ) ) )
(some charht values had to be adjusted by as much as 0.06586pt)
Font metrics written on ecrm1000.tfm.
Output written on ecrm1000.600gf (256 characters, 51364 bytes).
Transcript written on ecrm1000.log.
mktextfm: /var/cache/fonts/tfm/jknappen/ec/ecrm1000.tfm: successfully generated.
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/jadetex.efmt installed.
ERROR: memory dump jadetex.fmt was created, but cannot be found
/usr/share/texmf/tex/jadetex/config/jadetex.ini
fmtutil: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdfjadetex.efmt installed.
ERROR: memory dump jadetex.fmt was created, but cannot be found
failed.
ERROR: JadeTeX/PDFJadeTeX memory dump creation failed
This package could not be installed.
Please report this bug; include the file /tmp/jadetex-postinst.Np4syh
in the bug report.
dpkg: error processing jadetex (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of docbook-utils:
 docbook-utils depends on jadetex; however:
  Package jadetex is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing docbook-utils (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 303094-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 19:17:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 04 12:17:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DIX53-0008Fu-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:17:49 -0700
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
        by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DIX53-0003eA-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:17:49 -0600
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
j34JHmXE002303
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:17:48 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j34JHmCs002301
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:17:48 -0700
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:17:48 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: oops, this has already been fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

After I filed the bug, I noticed it had already been filed and fixed
in a version not yet available on sparc.

-- 
Blars Blarson                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to