Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:02:38 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301513: fixed in sslwrap 2.0.6-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2005 13:10:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 26 05:10:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFB3x-0000D8-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 05:10:49 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id DEDD832809F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:10:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0537328044
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:10:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id A6F3326136; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:10:48 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:10:48 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sslwrap: FTBFS: timestamp skew issues: WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is needed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: sslwrap
Version: 2.0.6-16
Severity: important
Hi,
Your package is currently failing to build on amd64 because of
timestamp skew issues. Those happen when you patch the configure
scripts and don't take special care of it. The problem is that
in the diff file the order of the files is not the same as the
order in which they get generated. This causes make to think
that some of those files need to be rebuild.
See /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz for more
information.
There are a few ways to solve this:
- Use AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
- Build depends on the needed auto*/libtool packages and force a
regeneration at build time of those files.
- Touch the files in the right order to prevent make from trying
to regenerate them.
Kurt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301513-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 17:11:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 10:11:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI8cx-0007HM-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:11:11 -0700
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI8cx-0000hE-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:11:11 -0600
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DI8Ug-0008Ab-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:02:38 -0400
From: Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#301513: fixed in sslwrap 2.0.6-17
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:02:38 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: sslwrap
Source-Version: 2.0.6-17
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sslwrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
sslwrap_2.0.6-17.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/sslwrap/sslwrap_2.0.6-17.diff.gz
sslwrap_2.0.6-17.dsc
to pool/main/s/sslwrap/sslwrap_2.0.6-17.dsc
sslwrap_2.0.6-17_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/sslwrap/sslwrap_2.0.6-17_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sslwrap package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:47:24 +0100
Source: sslwrap
Binary: sslwrap
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.6-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Jonathan McDowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
sslwrap - Simple TCP service encryption using TLS/SSL
Closes: 301513 301675 302795
Changes:
sslwrap (2.0.6-17) unstable; urgency=low
.
* The "Shoot me, I deserve it" release.
* Don't touch inetd.conf or inetd in our init script, only pre/postinst.
(closes: #302795)
* Use AM_MAINTAINER_MODE in configure to avoid time-stamp skew issues
on build. (closes: #301513)
* Just use "user" syntax for update-inetd; our only group is sslwrap anyway
and it appears the update-inetds don't agree about syntax. Also delete
the old format lines before trying to create the new format ones.
(closes: #301675)
Files:
927cb6245123786aeaf9af606a2da3f1 579 net optional sslwrap_2.0.6-17.dsc
7172f0bb056fbd2dea0a9c6f3441e69f 78999 net optional sslwrap_2.0.6-17.diff.gz
1f595bc7fc7ac3ef4e6a09726210f1bb 39812 net optional sslwrap_2.0.6-17_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCUB/q8b1L5FtDA2cRAunQAKCuoFEZSykMMIy9MmcMEkhXpB1NKgCfUCLv
enjO+8R8/BLfqD5/9CKq9Wg=
=Cw9M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
