-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03-04-2005 14:11, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 05:41:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> 
>>Hi Robert,
>>
>>There are seven new RC bugs in the BTS today about packages in testing that
>>have a build-dependency on the newest version of type-handling.  That
>>version of type-handling is being held out of sarge because of lessdisks,
>>which produces a binary package that depends on things like not+alpha and
>>not+i386.  There doesn't seem to be any equivalent Provides: in the current
>>version of type-handling.  Can you offer a solution for Jonas so that
>>type-handling can be updated in testing without having to drop lessdisks?
>>
>>Also, there are other packages in testing which have build-dependencies on
>>type-handling (>= 0.2.1).  Are these build-dependencies really going to be
>>satisfied by type-handling 0.2.7, or has the package changed too much?
> 
> 
> Fixed in 0.2.8, uploading with urgency=high.

For your information (and sorry I forgot to mention earlier), lessdisks
has worked around this, so currently do not rely on type-handling anymore.

If what you "fixed" is actually bringing back the virtual arch-boolean
packages then we might consider switching back, though, as lessdisks is
a purely scriptiong package so it feels somewhat stupid being forced to
make it arch: any.

On the other hand, I've been on my way filing a wishlist bugreport on
somehow avoiding the dependency on developer tools for type-handling:
When used to fulfill binary dependencies those dependencies bloats the
installation.


But, in short: lessdisks should no longer be of (major) concern with
regards to this bugreport.


Greetings!

 - Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nÃr: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCT+54n7DbMsAkQLgRAos0AJ4nBUCgxG2EArF5fMR8uldamLwd3ACdGKEl
9h0oYF9Zkem+Vd+8LpGfOTs=
=o2GD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to