-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02-04-2005 10:21, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> 
>>>For unsupported/untested architectures, I choose to make it depend on 
>>>nothing,
>>>although this could be handled better.
>>
>>How? I am quite interested in improving the situation for untested archs
>>if at all possible.
> 
> 
> I don't know, I just think there's probably a better fix. Maybe only
> building the packages on arches with a supported kernel. Or adding
> support for all arches, as I am trying to do. ;-)

Given the long discussions I've had with Vagrant on this, I prefer
making the untested archs aware of the kernel-image-netbootable package
- - so that we can reach the ultimate goal of getting proper support for
all archs (or at least know for sure if an arch won't work).

Hmm - thinking now that maybe a step in the right direction would be a
debconf warning on untested archs, that it didn't know what to pull in
and feedback is appreciated. Whatta you think?


> However, I just noticed your April 1 updates, looks like we ended up
> working in the same direction on this dependency problem.

Yeah :-)

I'll postpone the upload of -15 some hours to give the debconf approach
a chance in my head and in yours...


Have a look here for a sneak preview:
http://debian.jones.dk/auryn/pool/official/lessdisks/


 - Jonas

- --
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nÃr: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCTmGjn7DbMsAkQLgRAm9sAJ4w70UKUxjJb9eZvZfMNDTpCORKYgCeOsQD
RmjEtFJ8No3YmcNQqC9qDUU=
=KxTa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to