Your message dated Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:40:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#299709: Shall I upload libexif1 to
unstable]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2005 23:03:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 15 15:03:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hourri.hittite.isp.9tel.net [62.62.156.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DBL4q-0002dQ-00; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:03:52 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.73] (45-243-118-80.kaptech.net [80.118.243.45])
by hourri.hittite.isp.9tel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6BB8A15A9E5; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:08:28 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Beno=EEt_Deville?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: digikam: Fails to install
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:13:30 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: digikam
Version: 0.7-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Says it depends on libkexif1 which seems not to be installable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages digikam depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-4 KDE core libraries
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library
ii libgdbm3 1.8.3-2 GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii libgphoto2-2 2.1.5-4 gphoto2 digital camera library
ii libgphoto2-port0 2.1.5-4 gphoto2 digital camera port librar
ii libimlib2 1.2.0-2.1 powerful image loading and renderi
ii libimlib2-dev 1.2.0-2.1 Imlib2 development files
ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libkexif0 0.1-2 KDE library to read/edit EXIF info
ii libkipi0 0.1.1-2 library for apps that want to use
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.3-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libtiff4 3.7.1-4 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299709-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 20:40:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 30 12:40:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-80-43-209-69.access.as9105.com (debian) [80.43.209.69]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGjzI-00011m-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:40:28 -0800
Received: from debian by debian with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DGjzF-0003dn-7F
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:40:25 +0100
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:40:19 +0100
From: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#299709: Shall I upload libexif1 to unstable]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on debian); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
libkexif1 uploaded to unstable.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libkexif
----- Forwarded message from Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:54:00 +0000
Reply-To: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Paul Telford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:48:27 UTC
Resent-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 299709
X-Debian-PR-Package: digikam
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: sid
From: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jean-Michel Kelbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Sender: Debian BTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-PTS-Package: digikam
X-PTS-Keyword: bts
X-Unsubscribe: echo 'unsubscribe digikam' | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 146.82.138.7
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#299709: Shall I upload libexif1 to unstable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on debian
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=1.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.2
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on debian)
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 165
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:14:24AM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> > > Both libkexif1 & libkexif0 can co-exist in unstable together and
> > > libkexif0 won't be removed until all reverse dependancies are taken care
> > > of.
> >
> > That's not true; libkexif0 and libkexif1 are both built from the libkexif
> > source package, so if you upload the experimental version of libkexif to
> > unstable, the old libkexif0 binaries will be removed.
>
> Another reason to coordinate the libkexif upload with a showimg update.
> I contacted Jean-Michel (DD of showimg, cc'ed) Monday last week via mail
> already. This Monday I've prepare a deb (#300813). No response yet.
Hey guys,digikam, showimg and libkexif0 are sitting quite well together in
testing.
The next step is to upload libkexif1 into unstable so
that we can move to the next upstream versions.
> When Jean-Michel is ready we should (re)upload libkexif to sid together
> with showimg, rebuild kipi-plguins and digikamimageplugins 0.7.2.
I don't think we need to wait for showimg in unstable. Unstable is
allowed to be broken and have packages in a half built state. If we
wait for coordination across all pacakges we can end up waiting a long
time.
> > Given how few packages depend on this library, and given that one of them is
> > already broken, there's probably no reason to hold off on uploading the new
> > libkexif to unstable.
>
> Short story:
> This implies: broken digikam versus maybe will be broken showimg on arch !=
> i386.
> I was of course tempted but I resisted because I'm not involved in showimg
> pkging.
>
> Long version:
> digikam 0.7.2, links against libkexif1 and conflicts with kipi-plugins and
> digikamplugins in sid (linked against libkexif1). Therefore the 'need'
> to upload libkexif1, and rebuild kipi-plugins and digikamplugins (that link
> against libkexif1) in one go. [Everything already prepared in
> http://www.mpe.mpg.de/~ach/debian/experimental (with dist = sid)]
I intend to upload libkexif1 and rebuilt kipi-plugins and digkameplugins
to unstable. They will all sit in unstable until showimg is uploaded to
unstable at which time they can all migrate to testing together.
I don't want to wait on this any longer. showimg can catch up when it is
ready.
Mark
----- End forwarded message -----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
