On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:07:33PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:58:30PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Package: xfsprogs > > Version: 2.6.26-1 > > Severity: grave > > > This package seems to be not built on unstable, libhandle requests > > executable stack, while a unstable build does not do that. > > I've uploaded recompile-only binNMUs for each of attr, acl, and xfsprogs on > i386, which is the only architecture that should be affected.
Thanks Steve. Not sure it worked out for xfsprogs, there was already a subsequent version queued. I have recompiled latest xfsprogs with the currente gcc, which I had to install "by hand" (apt-get upgrade wouldn't get it)... must be some interdependency issue with some packages here?, cos even this morning I'm seeing gcc being held back via "apt-get upgrade": Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages have been kept back: abiword abiword-common base-config build-essential bzflag bzflag-server chbg cpp debconf debconf-utils debianutils dialog dmsetup dnsutils docbook-xml dpkg e2fsprogs enlightenment eog fetchmail file fileutils fontconfig g++ gcc gdk-imlib1 gdm gimp1.2 gnome-core gnome-panel gnome-panel-data gnome-session gnome-terminal gnumeric gnupg gs ibritish icewm imlib1 ispell libarchive-tar-perl libcupsys2 libfnlib0 libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 libgdk-pixbuf2 libgnomeprint-bin libgnomeprint-data libgnomeprint15 libgtk2.0-0 libgtkxmhtml1 libimlib2 libkrb53 libldap2 libmail-audit-perl libnspr4 libnss3 libpam-modules libpaper1 libpaperg libpng2 libsasl7 libscrollkeeper0 libxslt1 lilo lintian lsof-2.2 ltp-disc-test lvm2 mailx mount mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm mutt nautilus netbase nfs-common po-debconf python quota rep-gtk reportbug samba-common sawfish scrollkeeper sendmail sgml-data shellutils sodipodi sox sysklogd sysvinit tasksel tcpdump textutils util-linux uucp wenglish whiptail xbase-clients xchat xchat-common xlibmesa3 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 104 not upgraded. > Nathan, please be sure to build your binaries against current unstable > systems (chroot or otherwise) in the future when uploading to unstable; > otherwise, we end up with binary packages that are not reproducible using > current tools. I do follow unstable quite closely, and usually will have done an apt-get upgrade before building/installing/testing the current xfs tools -- I got thwarted by the above issue though. I'll upload a new xfsprogs shortly, I've confirmed the execute bit is not set on the stack segment via objdump with libhandle built using the latest unstable gcc. cheers. -- Nathan
pgpFQHApZRMzs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
