Your message dated Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:12:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301655: subversion: FTBFS in sarge: Build depends on swig
(>=1.3.24)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 14:26:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 06:26:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFYic-0001js-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 06:26:22 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id D2C86224042
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:26:21 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A047E224034
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:26:21 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 4724126136; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:26:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:26:21 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: subversion: FTBFS in sarge: Build depends on swig (>=1.3.24)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: subversion
Version: 1.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
Hi,
subversion is currently failing to build on sarge because it
build depends on swig (>=1.3.24) which is not available in sarge
yet. It's blocked by an other RC bug: #298028
Once that version of swig enters sarge you can close this bug.
PS: Is there a reason you need that version to build or can you
fix it using an older version?
Kurt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301655-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Mar 2005 05:12:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 21:12:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DFmXt-0006Bq-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:12:13 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 94A07171E11; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:12:12 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#301655: subversion: FTBFS in sarge: Build depends on swig
(>=1.3.24)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:26:21PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: subversion
> Version: 1.1.3-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sarge
> subversion is currently failing to build on sarge because it
> build depends on swig (>=3D1.3.24) which is not available in sarge
> yet. It's blocked by an other RC bug: #298028
> Once that version of swig enters sarge you can close this bug.
This version of swig will enter sarge tomorrow. :)
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCR5IoKN6ufymYLloRAkvCAJ0WWgC5nTnsGLvc5B6TSxd26TaUEACdEAeD
O9QnVEfdRFWkLdowZeAhKAA=
=tpgv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
