severity 300278 important
thanks

On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 09:34:13AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:26:41AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I'm not convinced that this is actually a bug in defoma; the trouble is that
> > the failure happens in the fontconfig *pre*rm script, and fontconfig depends
> > on defoma -- so how is it possible that defoma's files have been removed
> > before the "prerm remove" call for a package depending on it, unless there
> > is a bug in dpkg?

> You know, it's entirely possible that this was left over screwage from
> some other fontconfig/defoma/whatever mess.

Ok, downgrading; I'll leave it to the maintainer to evaluate whether this is
something that needs changing.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to