Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:49:46 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in
/usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 18:04:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 10:04:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pthierry.net1.nerim.net (imperatrice.arcanes.fr.eu.org)
[213.41.153.205] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDRGW-0007Ci-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:04:36 -0800
Received: from bateleur.arcanes.fr.eu.org (bateleur.arcanes [192.168.1.1])
by imperatrice.arcanes.fr.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EACD8E096
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:10:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bateleur.arcanes.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 02FB9DC111; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:04:34 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:04:34 +0100
From: Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual are loop symlinks
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: r-doc-html
Version: 2.0.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/R/doc/manual$ ll *.html
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 2005-03-21 18:29 R-admin.html -> ../../../../lib=
/R/doc/manual/R-admin.html
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-data.html -> ../../../../lib/=
R/doc/manual/R-data.html
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-exts.html -> ../../../../lib/=
R/doc/manual/R-exts.html
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2005-03-21 18:29 R-FAQ.html -> ../../../../lib/R=
/doc/manual/R-FAQ.html
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 2005-03-21 18:29 R-intro.html -> ../../../../lib=
/R/doc/manual/R-intro.html
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-lang.html -> ../../../../lib/=
R/doc/manual/R-lang.html
I reinstalled the package to be sure it wasn't a modification made by
another one.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)
-- no debconf information
--=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCPwyyxe13INnVDYoRAogZAKC/lCFOp80Hj56YHlgfI0C3s++PXQCg3z2M
VYtXOEaxB440QcecLllD5ow=
=Gufj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300767-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 02:50:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 18:50:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDZTH-0002P2-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:50:19 -0800
Received: from basebud.nulle.part
(c-24-14-51-226.client.comcast.net[24.14.51.226])
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP
id <20050322024947014004ucs5e>; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:49:48 +0000
Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DDZSk-0007ka-9W; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:49:46 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:49:46 -0600
To: Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#300767: r-doc-html: HTML documents in /usr/lib/R/doc/manual
are loop symlinks
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.3.1
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On 21 March 2005 at 19:04, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
| Package: r-doc-html
| Version: 2.0.1-4
| Severity: grave
| Justification: renders package unusable
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/R/doc/manual$ ll *.html
| lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 2005-03-21 18:29 R-admin.html ->
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-admin.html
| lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-data.html ->
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-data.html
| lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-exts.html ->
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-exts.html
| lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2005-03-21 18:29 R-FAQ.html ->
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-FAQ.html
| lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 2005-03-21 18:29 R-intro.html ->
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-intro.html
| lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2005-03-21 18:29 R-lang.html ->
../../../../lib/R/doc/manual/R-lang.html
|
| I reinstalled the package to be sure it wasn't a modification made by
| another one.
You better check again. You may have a problem with your /usr/share/doc
hierarchy, or something else is going one. Here's why:
i) The package is over 1 mb large, would be difficult just with links:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> dpkg -s r-doc-html
Package: r-doc-html
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: doc
Installed-Size: 1568
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: all
Source: r-base
Version: 2.0.1-4
[...]
ii) The package really installs the files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -l /usr/lib/R/doc/manual/
total 1464
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 247523 Feb 20 19:33 R-FAQ.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 90154 Feb 20 19:33 R-admin.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 125649 Feb 20 19:33 R-data.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 365423 Feb 20 19:33 R-exts.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 369703 Feb 20 19:33 R-intro.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 261678 Feb 20 19:33 R-lang.html
iii) If you had checked the changelog, you would have noticed that the last
two uploads were dealing with nothing but r-doc-html issues. Don't you
think either I or the submitter of those bugs would have noticed if the
package had vanished?
iv) The package, and the R packages in general, are fairly popular. If
something that obvious is broken with a not-so-brand-new package (four
weeks and counting for 2.0.1-4), maybe the error is at your end?
So may I suggest that the next time you intend to file a RC bug, please
double check before you file it. If in doubt, either *ask* or maybe file as
'normal'. You can always increase the severity afterwards.
Thank you.
Dirk
|
| -- System Information:
| Debian Release: 3.1
| APT prefers testing
| APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
| Architecture: i386 (i686)
| Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
| Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
|
| -- no debconf information
|
| --
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
--
Better to have an approximate answer to the right question than a precise
answer to the wrong question. -- John Tukey as quoted by John Chambers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
