Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:36:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300426: linphone: FTBFS: disallowed characters (":") in
documentation sources (sgml)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2005 17:12:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 09:12:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DChUn-0002x3-00; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:12:17 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E97772D;
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:12:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-2-178.mnet-online.de [82.135.2.178])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318445FB06;
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:12:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8F3100BCA27;
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:12:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linphone: FTBFS: disallowed characters (":") in documentation sources
(sgml)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:12:11 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: linphone
Version: 0.12.2-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package linphone in a clean build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=========================================================================
[...]
WARNING: Parameter description missing in source code comment block -
FUNCTION: rtp_session_sendm_with_ts Parameter: userts.
WARNING: Parameter described in source code comment block but does not exist -
FUNCTION: rtp_session_sendm_with_ts Parameter: timestamp.
WARNING: Parameter described in source code comment block but does not exist -
MACRO: rtp_profile_get_name Parameter: Returns.
WARNING: Parameter described in source code comment block but does not exist -
MACRO: rtp_profile_get_payload Parameter: Returns.
81% symbol docs coverage (39 symbols documented, 9 not documented)
See ortp-undocumented.txt for a list of missing docs.
The doc coverage percentage doesn't include intro sections.
touch sgml-build.stamp
*** Building HTML ***
test -d ./html || mkdir ./html
cd ./html && gtkdoc-mkhtml ortp ../ortp-docs.sgml
/usr/bin/jade:../sgml/rtpsessionapi.sgml:21:57:E: character ":" is not allowed
in the value of attribute "LINKEND"
/usr/bin/jade:../sgml/rtpsessionapi.sgml:145:49:E: character ":" is not allowed
in the value of attribute "ID"
/usr/bin/jade:../sgml/rtpsessionapi.sgml:357:100:E: character ":" is not
allowed in the value of attribute "LINKEND"
/usr/bin/jade:../sgml/rtpsessionapi.sgml:562:123:E: character ":" is not
allowed in the value of attribute "LINKEND"
make[5]: *** [html-build.stamp] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/linphone-0.12.2/oRTP/docs'
make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/linphone-0.12.2/oRTP'
make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/linphone-0.12.2/oRTP'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/linphone-0.12.2'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/linphone-0.12.2'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
=========================================================================
Thanks for considering.
--
DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite
http://darts.alioth.debian.org/
Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically.
DARTS just helped finding the problem.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300426-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 08:36:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 00:36:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCvuk-0005kg-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 00:36:03 -0800
Received: from bee.dooz.org (levallois.dooz.org [81.57.180.178])
by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E25D2EC48D;
Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:36:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E3068694DF16; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:36:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:36:04 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#300426: linphone: FTBFS: disallowed characters (":") in
documentation sources (sgml)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> At least two other packages, libgnomedb (bug #296863) and libgda, FTBFS=
with
> the same error; this is a bug in gtk-doc-tools or in some tool that it
> invokes. The suggestion in bug #296863 is that it's a jade bug.
The discussion of this problem was already in progress, and a new
gtk-doc, version 1.3-3, with a fix on which upstream agrees was
uploaded and shouldn't trigger this kind of FTBFS anymore
linphone shouldn't FTBFS with newer gtk-doc-tools, since it built
fine on all arches, no new upload is needed. You might want to
build-depend on a newer gtk-doc-tools to ensure builds are successful,
but this is not required.
Closing this bug.
Regards,
--=20
Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
