Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:33:11 +1030
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300359: /usr/i586-mingw32msvc not FHS compliant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2005 08:35:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 00:35:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pthierry.net1.nerim.net (imperatrice.arcanes.fr.eu.org)
[213.41.153.205] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCZQH-0003Er-00; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:35:06 -0800
Received: from bateleur.arcanes.fr.eu.org (bateleur.arcanes [192.168.1.1])
by imperatrice.arcanes.fr.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70408E08A
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:40:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bateleur.arcanes.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E76A4DC111; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:35:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:35:03 +0100
From: Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /usr/i586-mingw32msvc not FHS compliant
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: mingw32
Version: 3.4.2.20040916.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS chapter 4
No package should install a directory directly in /usr
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages mingw32 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii mingw32-binutils 2.15.94-20050118.1-1 Minimalist GNU win32 (cross) b=
inut
ii mingw32-runtime 3.7-1 Minimalist GNU win32 (cross) r=
unti
-- no debconf information
--=20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCO+Q3xe13INnVDYoRAvekAJ9jRpyG40aoGjw/5Jx1qaPbwpyGXQCfd7hT
0tPIlDWsqJsLB3zZbXfDEbM=
=tMWC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300359-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2005 10:03:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 02:03:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppp34-156.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net (hank.shelbyville.oz)
[150.101.34.156]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCanr-0006tg-00; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 02:03:31 -0800
Received: from ron by hank.shelbyville.oz with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DCanZ-0005x2-Bw; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:33:13 +1030
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:33:11 +1030
To: Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#300359: /usr/i586-mingw32msvc not FHS compliant
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Read README.Debian. Then fix policy and upstream. Then I'll consider
this serious. For now its the established behaviour of a bigger force
than the fhs, and out of my control to boot. I'm closing this as it is
already documented, along with other issues, in both the README and
lintian overrides of the package.
Personally though (after maintaining this as long as I have) I now
suspect the fhs will be the first to blink :-) It didn't have much to
say about cross target files the last time I read it, and I've yet to
see a solid proposal for locating these files elsewhere, so this one is
growing roots and ever more likely to form the basis of anything that is.
That's an argument for people other than me to have though,
Ron
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 09:35:03AM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Package: mingw32
> Version: 3.4.2.20040916.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FHS chapter 4
>
> No package should install a directory directly in /usr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
