Your message dated Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:36:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300170: Consequences of udev being pulled in by Gnome
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 06:02:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 17 22:02:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DCAZJ-00025a-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:02:46 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 64BA41C00090;
        Fri, 18 Mar 2005 07:02:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-59-16.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr 
[82.126.135.16])
        by mwinf1108.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 40DF41C00082;
        Fri, 18 Mar 2005 07:02:14 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from luther by pegasos with local (Exim 4.44)
        id 1DCAKg-0001b5-69; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 06:47:38 +0100
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 06:47:38 +0100
To: Rick_Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3 days until end of test period
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: debian-installer
severity: grave

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:34:33AM -0500, Rick_Thomas wrote:
> I tried it on a 350MHz G4 PowerMac (NewWorld) at the office.  All went
> well except for one strangeness.  Since the same thing happened on my
> beige G3 last night, I'm curious if anyone else has seen it?

Cool

> Last night I thought it was just a glitch -- the beige G3 hardware is
> sometimes a little flaky.  But now I'm not so sure.  The G4 machine has
> always been solid as a rock, hardware-wise.
> 
> The weirdness is this:
> 
> Installing with the 2.6.8 kernel (single processor version, if it
> matters)  The initial reboot goes just fine, and drops me into tasksel,
> where I select "print server", and "desktop environment".  All the
> installation and setup stuff goes as expected, but when everything is
> over and I try to log out, I never get a "login:" prompt or a Gnome
> login window.  If I switch to another virtual console (alt-F2) and try
> to login there it accepts my login and password, but I never get a shell
> prompt.

I had this also, but a reboot solved it.

> I had to go to another machine and do "ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] /sbin/reboot" 
> because using "slogin [EMAIL PROTECTED]" got me the point where I enter my 
> root
> password, then the same hang as I saw on the second virtual console.
> 
> Sound familiar?  What am I doing wrong?

Don't know once is a coincidence, but 3 times is a problem, which i believe is
RC. We should fill a bug, but i don't know what package to fill it at, let's
say the installer for now.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300170-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 09:47:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 18 01:47:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DCE4p-00087K-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:47:31 -0800
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 9494D5F7AA; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:47:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
        id E9DC31C499; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:36:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:36:12 +0100
To: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bug#300170: Consequences of udev being pulled in by Gnome
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected],
        [email protected]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z4+8/lEcDcG5Ke9S"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


--z4+8/lEcDcG5Ke9S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mar 18, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>   3) Inform the user that a reboot is needed in order for it to work.
No, it's not! Months ago I did a lot of work in postinst to support
reboot-less installation of udev.
There is not enough data in this bug report to even start investigating
it but I believe that the problem is caused by #296776 and #296975,
which I fixed over a month ago but are being kept out of testing by the
broken arm buildd.
Cc'ed to the release managers, who may want to force again udev in
testing to fix these RC bugs.

--=20
ciao,
Marco

--z4+8/lEcDcG5Ke9S
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCOqEMFGfw2OHuP7ERAldGAJ4tQlK52/vz4jcdqJti8qHSbXdV8gCfewte
HqbjrAGhO6gD7b+BxZ9TpLs=
=yZrL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--z4+8/lEcDcG5Ke9S--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to