Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:48:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300136: fixed in ucf 1.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 00:12:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 17 16:12:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pyton.efd.lth.se [130.235.34.42] (root)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DC56V-0002u3-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:12:39 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (h55x311.delphi.afb.lu.se [130.235.189.8])
        by pyton.efd.lth.se (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2I0CbxH016564;
        Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:12:37 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Carl_F=C3=BCrstenberg?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lineakd: debconf problem/typo
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:12:26 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: lineakd
Version: 1:0.8.3-2
Severity: important

can not be installed because it want to run debconf-loadtemplates when only 
debconf-loadtemplate is in path

/usr/bin/ucf: line 55: debconf-loadtemplates: command not found

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages lineakd depends on:
ii  libc6                2.3.2.ds1-20        GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1              1:4.0-0pre5         GCC support library
ii  libice6              6.8.1-0.4           Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm6               6.8.1-0.4           X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5           1:3.3.5-12          The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6             4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6             6.8.1-0.4           X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  ucf                  1.15                Update Configuration File: preserv
ii  xlibs                6.8.1-0.4           X Window System client libraries m

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300136-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 02:08:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 17 18:08:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DC6uE-00026u-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:08:07 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DC6at-0008PF-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:48:07 -0500
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#300136: fixed in ucf 1.16
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:48:07 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: ucf
Source-Version: 1.16

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ucf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ucf_1.16.dsc
  to pool/main/u/ucf/ucf_1.16.dsc
ucf_1.16.tar.gz
  to pool/main/u/ucf/ucf_1.16.tar.gz
ucf_1.16_all.deb
  to pool/main/u/ucf/ucf_1.16_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ucf package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 16:55:42 -0600
Source: ucf
Binary: ucf
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 ucf        - Update Configuration File: preserves user changes to config files
Closes: 300136
Changes: 
 ucf (1.16) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Bug fix: "Typo on line 55 of /usr/bin/ucf", thanks to Troy Arnold
                                                          (Closes: #300136).
Files: 
 e2dd42f2a44cc73fd6cdebe758d45320 479 utils optional ucf_1.16.dsc
 7ee5538e5fea6c91f620a665f0f7b0a7 76849 utils optional ucf_1.16.tar.gz
 e1baa7ea11d32320569a2b9c39a07549 36316 utils optional ucf_1.16_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCOjBxIbrau78kQkwRAjzLAJ452S3FdvFp3QganI1hsDMxt1WZxQCfSnSH
q+Thjxdox7SRKGV52bj9UVI=
=76ki
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to