Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:32:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300106: fixed in netatalk 2.0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2005 17:16:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 17 09:16:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DByc2-0000FT-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:16:46 -0800
Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16])
by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E40116EB1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:16:45 -0700 (MST)
Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0ADC68F330; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:16:45 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:16:45 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: netatalk_2.0.2-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: netatalk
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of netatalk_2.0.2-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050317-1237
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.6), debhelper (>= 4.1.46), dh-buildinfo, d-shlibs
> (>> 0.19), libdb4.2-dev, libwrap0-dev, libpam0g-dev, libslp-dev,
> libcupsys2-dev
[...]
> checking for /usr/kerberos... no
> checking gssapi.h usability... no
> checking gssapi.h presence... no
> checking for gssapi.h... no
> checking gssapi/gssapi_generic.h usability... no
> checking gssapi/gssapi_generic.h presence... no
> checking for gssapi/gssapi_generic.h... no
> checking gssapi/gssapi.h usability... no
> checking gssapi/gssapi.h presence... no
> checking for gssapi/gssapi.h... no
> checking gssapi/gssapi_krb5.h usability... no
> checking gssapi/gssapi_krb5.h presence... no
> checking for gssapi/gssapi_krb5.h... no
> configure: error: GSSAPI installation not found, headers missing
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=netatalk&ver=2.0.2-1
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300106-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2005 23:38:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 17 15:38:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DC4ZL-0003Uu-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:38:23 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DC4TH-0002Vp-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:32:07 -0500
From: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#300106: fixed in netatalk 2.0.2-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:32:07 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: netatalk
Source-Version: 2.0.2-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netatalk, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
netatalk_2.0.2-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.2-2.diff.gz
netatalk_2.0.2-2.dsc
to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.2-2.dsc
netatalk_2.0.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/netatalk/netatalk_2.0.2-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netatalk package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 23:35:56 +0100
Source: netatalk
Binary: netatalk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
netatalk - AppleTalk user binaries
Closes: 300106
Changes:
netatalk (2.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/control: Added homepage URL to the long description.
* debian/control: Added missing build dependency on heimdal-dev.
+ Closes: #300106 "FTBFS: missing build-depends?"
Files:
bdbe0f2a9a14e039a02025d80fece96b 789 net extra netatalk_2.0.2-2.dsc
d9250af3b0a9f3de452ad404911ca470 44953 net extra netatalk_2.0.2-2.diff.gz
abfabbf0515e1c3ad8b950b9ce6dad5f 765722 net extra netatalk_2.0.2-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCOgk8cU5mtElqGCcRAksvAJ4jpY9pBk6lSAkNjih6JIjxxXNuKwCg2dKL
LHBzN0gNJunGhON+/YyqzgU=
=+d7i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
