Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299753: fixed in control-center 1:2.8.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 06:17:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 15 22:17:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DBRqV-0005rx-00; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:17:31 -0800
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DBRX6-0003yK-DZ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:57:33 +0100
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:57:25 +0100
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Broken build-depends
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: control-center
Severity: serious
The control-center build depends now contain, amongst others:
> libasound2-dev (>= 1.0.3b-1) []
This is invalid syntax in the control file, and does not what you expect
it to do -- most tools will consider this as a no-op, and not demand
this package to be installed. Also, this invalid syntax breaks at least
one archive tool (not too serious, but whatever).
--Jeroen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299753-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 22:53:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 14:53:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DBhO2-0002Q2-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:53:10 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DBhIJ-0000V9-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:15 -0500
From: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#299753: fixed in control-center 1:2.8.2-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:47:15 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: control-center
Source-Version: 1:2.8.2-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
control-center, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
capplets-data_2.8.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/c/control-center/capplets-data_2.8.2-2_all.deb
capplets_2.8.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/control-center/capplets_2.8.2-2_i386.deb
control-center_2.8.2-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/control-center/control-center_2.8.2-2.diff.gz
control-center_2.8.2-2.dsc
to pool/main/c/control-center/control-center_2.8.2-2.dsc
gnome-control-center_2.8.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/control-center/gnome-control-center_2.8.2-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated control-center
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:29:27 +0100
Source: control-center
Binary: capplets gnome-control-center capplets-data
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:2.8.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Arnaud Patard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
capplets - configuration applets for GNOME 2 - binaries files
capplets-data - configuration applets for GNOME 2 - data files
gnome-control-center - The GNOME Control Center for GNOME 2
Closes: 299753
Changes:
control-center (1:2.8.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/control:
- fixes the Build-Depends (Closes: #299753).
Files:
77efdb510eb1709fa54dd292eb3b9c8b 2151 gnome optional control-center_2.8.2-2.dsc
75d041e755d85817cda7bb0031ebb862 60662 gnome optional
control-center_2.8.2-2.diff.gz
0a5275ee59adbf37acbb75205984c891 1830582 gnome optional
capplets-data_2.8.2-2_all.deb
4e25252616150d3148ac75e7a607f05d 593786 gnome optional
capplets_2.8.2-2_i386.deb
1ad4864f381c0efa7ed99ced770c7e03 71928 gnome optional
gnome-control-center_2.8.2-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCOLVPQxo87aLX0pIRAmZvAKCzSYOHkfcZ1JGg9ipLKUsxf+lVggCfV7Y7
IHNl4PstStE1zZjcnFIa+qY=
=pOVV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
