Your message dated Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:02:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298980: fixed in culmus 0.101-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 22:13:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 14:13:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mtaout4.barak.net.il [212.150.49.174] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D9Vu6-0002UH-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:13:14 -0800
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([212.150.100.211])
 by mtaout4.barak.net.il (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.02
 (built Aug 25 2004)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:14:00 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:12:26 +0200
From: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Culmus: not installable after upgrading to fontconfig 2.3.1-1
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: culmus
Version: 0.101-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi Baruch,

I upgraded to fontconfig 2.3.1-1 and saw it overwrites the previous conf. I 
guessed that culmus add stuff to /etc/fonts/local.conf and decided to reinstall 
the package.

Fontconfig new version had a change: usage of /etc/fonts/conf.d instead of 
/etc/fonts/local.conf. Thus make culmus uninstallable send the installtions 
scrpits fail and leave the package in Failconfig status.

It seems that the sulution shold be very easy.

Some log from my machine:
laptop:~# apt-get --reinstall install culmus
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded.
Need to get 1051kB of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Get:1 http://mirror.hamakor.org.il unstable/main culmus 0.101-1 [1051kB]
Fetched 1051kB in 3m45s (4659B/s)
Preconfiguring packages ...
grep: /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory
(Reading database ... 51579 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace culmus 0.101-1 (using .../culmus_0.101-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement culmus ...
grep: /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory
Setting up culmus (0.101-1) ...
grep: /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory
grep: /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory
grep: /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory
sed: can't read /etc/fonts/local.conf: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing culmus (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 culmus
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

laptop:~# dpkg -l fontconfig
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version        Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii  fontconfig     2.3.1-1        generic font configuration library

laptop:~# dpkg -l culmus
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name           Version        Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
iF  culmus         0.101-1        Type1 Hebrew Fonts for X11

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages culmus depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0 1.4.46              Debian configuration management sy
ii  xutils               4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System utility programs

-- debconf information excluded

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 298980-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2005 03:08:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 12 19:08:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DAJSh-0003u2-00; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 19:08:15 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DAJMo-00078i-00; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:02:10 -0500
From: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#298980: fixed in culmus 0.101-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:02:10 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: culmus
Source-Version: 0.101-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
culmus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

culmus_0.101-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/culmus/culmus_0.101-2.diff.gz
culmus_0.101-2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/culmus/culmus_0.101-2.dsc
culmus_0.101-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/culmus/culmus_0.101-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated culmus package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:47:18 +0000
Source: culmus
Binary: culmus
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.101-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 culmus     - Type1 Hebrew Fonts for X11
Closes: 298980
Changes: 
 culmus (0.101-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * The fontconfig package switched to a conf.d directory structure. Yay!
     - Remove our hack to add our configuration to the configuration.
     - Remove debconf question, it's meaningless now.
     - Plug the culmus.conf in the conf.d directory,
     - Package is installable now (Closes: #298980)
Files: 
 2b35be41980e73fc1a883bf0c18a4aa5 563 x11 optional culmus_0.101-2.dsc
 3ea10baaa78fd8e8153e11e745595ada 2594 x11 optional culmus_0.101-2.diff.gz
 fb133d8171bac9c93c5fb7a4e4e2ebc6 1049794 x11 optional culmus_0.101-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCM6noHCar6qtHRZgRAortAKDD/h50UbNa/oxDJ+CSzyURYuAvvQCfWv+9
7VyPc3vKa5EGZqn1vrciUjE=
=7PGQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to