On Mar 12, Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:39:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
 > > docbook2pdf local-fontconfig-user.sgml
 > > Using catalogs: /etc/sgml/catalog
 > > Using stylesheet: /usr/share/docbook-utils/docbook-utils.dsl#print
 > > Working on: /build/buildd/fontconfig-2.3.0/doc/local-fontconfig-user.sgml
 > > openjade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/dbrfntry.dsl:83:3:E:
 > >  flow objects at the root must be all of class scroll or all of class 
 > > page-sequence or simple-page-sequence
 > > /usr/share/docbook-utils/backends/pdf: line 9:  3698 Illegal instruction   
 > >   $SGML_JADE -t tex -o ${SGML_FILE_NAME}.tex $SGML_ARGUMENTS
 > 
 > Some further investigation on this:
 > 
 > fontconfig builds fine if jade is installed but not if only openjade is
 > installed. So the real error here seems to be the openjade error, not
 > the segv in docbook-utils that is caused by it.
 > 
 > Since I don't know that much about the docbook SGML toolchain, I'm
 > unsure how to proceed: should fontconfig build-depend on jade? Or
 > is this a bug in openjade? Or really in docbook-utils?
 > 
 > Gruesse,
 > -- 
 > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > www: http://www.djpig.de/

The openjade error message is saying that there is a problem in the stylesheet
dbrfntry.dsl, part of the docbook-dsssl package.  I suppose since the error
occurs for openjade and not jade that it could actually be an error in
openjade.  I maintain jade, openjade and openjade1.3.  I can look into whether
this is an openjade error if someone will tell me how to reproduce it - will
the error occur if I just get the current source of fontconfig from unstable
and attempt to build the package?

I CC'ed the docbook-dsssl package on this.  It's maintained by Peter
Eisentraut.  Peter, can you take a look at the stylesheets and see if
there is a problem in dbrfntry.dsl?

-- 
Neil Roeth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to