Your message dated Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:20:46 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#267880: Shouldn't be included on sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2004 21:01:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 24 14:01:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from aveiro.procergs.com.br [200.198.128.211] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BziQI-0002up-00; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:01:42 -0700
Received: from localhost (200-203-056-015.pltce7001.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br 
[200.203.56.15])
        by aveiro.procergs.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 112FA5015849; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:01:05 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FCF1C0B670;
        Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:01:44 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (nurf.casa [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 04529-03; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:01:39 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 1B7761C0B667; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:01:39 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Shouldn't be included on sarge
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:01:39 -0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at localhost
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: apt-proxy
Version: 1.9.17
Severity: serious

This package is really usable for most users but have a lot of already
know and serious bugs so I think is better leave it out of sarge.

A possibility is after this bugs are solved we maintain an official
backport for it or something like that.

Thanks,
Otavio Salvador

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR

Versions of packages apt-proxy depends on:
ii  bzip2                         1.0.2-1    A high-quality block-sorting file 
ii  debconf                       1.4.32     Debian configuration management sy
ii  python                        2.3.4-3sid An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-apt                    0.5.10     Python interface to libapt-pkg
ii  python-twisted                1.3.0-2    Event-based framework for internet

-- debconf information excluded

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 267880-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Mar 2005 19:20:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 07 11:20:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.191] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D8Nmd-00051K-00; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:20:51 -0800
Received: from [212.227.126.208] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
        by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 1D8Nmc-0007gC-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0100
Received: from [83.67.20.196] (helo=feathers.thehalls.de)
        by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 1D8Nmc-00076J-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0100
Received: by feathers.thehalls.de (Postfix, from userid 1050)
        id DEFB08008; Mon,  7 Mar 2005 19:20:47 +0000 (GMT)
From: Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#267880: Shouldn't be included on sarge
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 19:20:46 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
auth:b46e2b357ea7d4f6cadf4c99fb902606
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Monday 07 Mar 2005 18:54, you wrote:
> ch> What do you think Otavio?
>
> Ok for me.

OK let's go to sarge


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to