Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:33:55 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#281306: fixed in libapache-mod-backhand 1.2.2-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2004 01:38:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 14 17:38:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CTVoy-0004Ck-00; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:38:20 -0800
Received: (qmail 10867 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2004 01:23:56 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailout.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 15 Nov 2004 01:23:56 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id D2532BBB1F; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 02:23:23 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libapache-mod-backhand: build error: autoconf: command not found
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 02:23:23 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libapache-mod-backhand
Version: 1.2.2-7
Severity: serious

buildd.debian.org lists the following build error on m68k:

<--  snip  -->

...
checking for Apache module support via DSO through APACI... no
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: config.h is unchanged
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/libapache-mod-backhand-1.2.2'
cd . && autoconf
/bin/sh: line 1: autoconf: command not found
make[1]: *** [configure] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libapache-mod-backhand-1.2.2'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

<--  snip  -->

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 281306-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 00:38:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 16:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D4TUZ-00079R-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:38:04 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D4TQZ-0002KT-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:33:55 -0500
From: James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#281306: fixed in libapache-mod-backhand 1.2.2-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:33:55 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: libapache-mod-backhand
Source-Version: 1.2.2-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libapache-mod-backhand, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8.diff.gz
  to 
pool/main/liba/libapache-mod-backhand/libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8.diff.gz
libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8.dsc
  to pool/main/liba/libapache-mod-backhand/libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8.dsc
libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8_i386.deb
  to 
pool/main/liba/libapache-mod-backhand/libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated 
libapache-mod-backhand package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:14:06 +0000
Source: libapache-mod-backhand
Binary: libapache-mod-backhand
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.2-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libapache-mod-backhand - Load balancing module for Apache web server
Closes: 281306
Changes: 
 libapache-mod-backhand (1.2.2-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix build problems, thanks to patch from Frederik Schueler.
     Closes: #281306.
Files: 
 550599e45509fccd2fbaf9dec2e25908 686 web optional 
libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8.dsc
 e6e1d31f575fe58b35dafcfb52c66910 69399 web optional 
libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8.diff.gz
 01d45cf8750d9265f30cdcf23f623859 72018 web optional 
libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCHm5LpfJwKAkXqeQRAr3VAJsFY1JlrvrHgoccousDAv0Wd2NhMACdGmKm
vHUYbRIeJ0c8yXZu+1wvXPM=
=kCYV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to