Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:47:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296723: ndiswrapper should go to contrib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 10:16:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 02:16:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4G37-0004vl-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:16:49 -0800
Received: (qmail 17234 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 10:16:18 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 10:16:18 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0E8B4BB92A; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:16:17 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ndiswrapper should go to contrib
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:16:17 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ndiswrapper
Version: 0.12+1.0rc2-1
Severity: serious
Is there any way how ndiswrapper is currently useful without
non-free software?
If this is not the case, it has to go to contrib.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296723-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 21:22:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 13:22:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from faye.voxel.net [69.9.164.210] (369396112f31aaac76cb792de46f366f)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4QRj-0005rM-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:22:55 -0800
Received: from localhost (mouth.voxel.net [69.9.180.118])
by faye.voxel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9F337155;
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:22:54 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Bug#296723: ndiswrapper should go to contrib
From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EvVY/cK4m/oyduJoN/OQ"
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:47:44 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-EvVY/cK4m/oyduJoN/OQ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 10:01 -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Adrian Bunk said:
> > Package: ndiswrapper
> > Version: 0.12+1.0rc2-1
> > Severity: serious
> >=20
> >=20
> > Is there any way how ndiswrapper is currently useful without
> > non-free software?
> >=20
> > If this is not the case, it has to go to contrib.
>=20
> This was just recently discussed, and I believe the consensus was that
> there are free drivers, so there is no problem. And frankly, even if
> there wasn't a single free driver out there, ndiswrapper's purpose is to
> provide an NDIS interface for the linux kernel. It does this whether or
> not there are drivers available, so it's a non-argument.
>=20
> See also bug #289065
>=20
> Take care.
>=20
> Andres, I have not just closed this bug, as I wanted to give you a
> chance to look it over.
Yep; pretty much what I was going to say. There are free (gpl'd)
drivers out there. Closing...
--=20
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--=-EvVY/cK4m/oyduJoN/OQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCHgUw78o9R9NraMQRAjwzAJ4mXuxkYH5QLgTYiKkXPzrXMsp/RwCfSiDF
Kds4k3wfxwIFlYTUZqIx7Lw=
=Jjl0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-EvVY/cK4m/oyduJoN/OQ--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
