Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnupg 1.4.0 does not work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 20:02:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 12:02:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from natjimbo.rzone.de [81.169.145.162] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cyy2n-0007um-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:02:38 -0800
Received: from ngolde.de (pD9E74BA0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.231.75.160])
        by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j19K2Y23026663;
        Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:02:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: by ngolde.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 90FFD530058; Wed,  9 Feb 2005 21:02:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:02:03 +0100
From: Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnupg 1.4.0 does not work
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.7.1
X-Editor: Vim 6.3       http://www.vim.org/
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.6i   http://www.mutt.org/
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 2.6.10-nion http://www.debian.org/
X-My-Homepage: http://www.ngolde.de
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.0-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
the new gnupg package for version 1.4.0 doesn't work on my
system. With mutt gpg is not able to decrypt messages. But
if I try to enrypt a local file gpg hangs after decryption
with this message:
gpg: checking the trustdb
gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ...
gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ...

but the process 5163 is not running.
this makes gpg unusable for me.
Is this a know issue?
Regards Nico

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-nion
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) (i=
gnored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Versions of packages gnupg depends on:
ii  libbz2-1.0                  1.0.2-4      high-quality block-sorting fil=
e co
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii  libldap2                    2.1.30-3     OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libreadline5                5.0-10       GNU readline and history libra=
ries
ii  libusb-0.1-4                1:0.1.9-1    userspace USB programming libr=
ary
ii  makedev                     2.3.1-75     Creates device files in /dev
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.2-4    compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

--=20
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF ,'"`.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de           (  grml.org
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps    `._,'  =20
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFCCmw7HYflSXNkfP8RAgFaAKCxasbVgNoqTm6LPpmhbYS8WpkB9QCY2M6Q
RpbEVQeTvXzjELfQEHez/A==
=PXjP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 294454-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 15:42:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 07:42:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CzGSO-0006Ej-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:42:16 -0800
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
        by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.103 #192)
        id 1CzGRt-0003wh-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:45 +0100
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 10 Feb 2005 
16:41:45 +0100
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:44 +0100
From: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gnupg 1.4.0 does not work
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.12(0.116/4/2) i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR-P2: 13 packets (331.14 stats units) [2.98 Mnodes/s]
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 
2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On 10.02.05 Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello Hilmar,
> * Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-10 14:07]:
> > On 09.02.05 Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

Hi all,

> > > the new gnupg package for version 1.4.0 doesn't work on my
> > > system. With mutt gpg is not able to decrypt messages. But
> > > if I try to enrypt a local file gpg hangs after decryption
> > > with this message:
> > > gpg: checking the trustdb
> > > gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ...
> > > gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ...
> > > 
> > > but the process 5163 is not running.
> > > this makes gpg unusable for me.
> > > Is this a know issue?
> > > 
> > Just have a look at the look at ~/.gnupg . Is there still a
> > trustdb.gpg.lock from a further "gnupg --check-trustdb" run, which
> > has been died without removing it's lock file, or another gnupg
> > running in parallel?
> 
> of fcuk the lock file was the problem. so sorry for the
> noise and feel free to close the bug.
> 
Thanks,
  Closing.
-- 
sigmentation fault


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to