Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gnupg 1.4.0 does not work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 20:02:38 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 12:02:38 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from natjimbo.rzone.de [81.169.145.162] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cyy2n-0007um-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:02:38 -0800 Received: from ngolde.de (pD9E74BA0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.231.75.160]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j19K2Y23026663; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:02:35 +0100 (MET) Received: by ngolde.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90FFD530058; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:02:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:02:03 +0100 From: Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gnupg 1.4.0 does not work Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.7.1 X-Editor: Vim 6.3 http://www.vim.org/ X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.6i http://www.mutt.org/ X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 2.6.10-nion http://www.debian.org/ X-My-Homepage: http://www.ngolde.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: gnupg Version: 1.4.0-2 Severity: grave Hi, the new gnupg package for version 1.4.0 doesn't work on my system. With mutt gpg is not able to decrypt messages. But if I try to enrypt a local file gpg hangs after decryption with this message: gpg: checking the trustdb gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ... gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ... but the process 5163 is not running. this makes gpg unusable for me. Is this a know issue? Regards Nico -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-nion Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) (i= gnored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages gnupg depends on: ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-4 high-quality block-sorting fil= e co ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s an ii libldap2 2.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries ii libreadline5 5.0-10 GNU readline and history libra= ries ii libusb-0.1-4 1:0.1.9-1 userspace USB programming libr= ary ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --=20 Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 1024D/73647CFF ,'"`. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de ( grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps `._,' =20 and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFCCmw7HYflSXNkfP8RAgFaAKCxasbVgNoqTm6LPpmhbYS8WpkB9QCY2M6Q RpbEVQeTvXzjELfQEHez/A== =PXjP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 294454-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 15:42:17 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 07:42:16 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CzGSO-0006Ej-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:42:16 -0800 Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.103 #192) id 1CzGRt-0003wh-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:45 +0100 Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:45 +0100 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:41:44 +0100 From: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gnupg 1.4.0 does not work Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.12(0.116/4/2) i686 X-www.distributed.net: OGR-P2: 13 packets (331.14 stats units) [2.98 Mnodes/s] X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk X-Confirmation-Request: yes X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On 10.02.05 Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello Hilmar, > * Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-10 14:07]: > > On 09.02.05 Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi all, > > > the new gnupg package for version 1.4.0 doesn't work on my > > > system. With mutt gpg is not able to decrypt messages. But > > > if I try to enrypt a local file gpg hangs after decryption > > > with this message: > > > gpg: checking the trustdb > > > gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ... > > > gpg: waiting for lock (held by 5163 - probably dead) ... > > > > > > but the process 5163 is not running. > > > this makes gpg unusable for me. > > > Is this a know issue? > > > > > Just have a look at the look at ~/.gnupg . Is there still a > > trustdb.gpg.lock from a further "gnupg --check-trustdb" run, which > > has been died without removing it's lock file, or another gnupg > > running in parallel? > > of fcuk the lock file was the problem. so sorry for the > noise and feel free to close the bug. > Thanks, Closing. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]