Your message dated Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291289: fixed in mailman 2.1.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2005 21:23:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 13:23:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from howard.indypgh.org [128.2.97.176] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CrNIL-0000Cc-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:23:17 -0800
Received: from toups by howard.indypgh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CrNHb-0000G2-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:22:31 -0500
From: m. toups <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mailman: need versioned build-depends on dpatch
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "m. toups" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:22:31 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: mailman
Version: 2.1.5-5
Severity: normal
currently (2.1.5-5) mailman's Build-Depends line is as follows:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), autoconf, python-dev, dpatch
however trying to build mailman from source with dpatch 2.0.2 yielded:
applying patch 02_CAN-2004-1177_driver_css to ./
.../usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run: No such file or
directory
it looks like dpatch-run wasn't added until dpatch 2.0.9
upgrading to dpatch 2.0.10 solved this problem for me, but technically
there should be a versioned build-depends there
-matt
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux howard 2.2.26 #8 SMP Tue Mar 16 18:35:14 EST 2004 sparc
unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 291289-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 11:54:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 03:54:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzCuQ-0007LE-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:54:58 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzCnD-0007UO-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500
From: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#291289: fixed in mailman 2.1.5-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:47:31 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: mailman
Source-Version: 2.1.5-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mailman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
mailman_2.1.5-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/m/mailman/mailman_2.1.5-6.diff.gz
mailman_2.1.5-6.dsc
to pool/main/m/mailman/mailman_2.1.5-6.dsc
mailman_2.1.5-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mailman/mailman_2.1.5-6_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated mailman package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:10:42 +0100
Source: mailman
Binary: mailman
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.5-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
mailman - Powerful, web-based mailing list manager
Closes: 283973 291289 293002 294467
Changes:
mailman (2.1.5-6) unstable; urgency=high
.
* SECURITY UPDATE: fix information disclosure
* Added debian/patches/04_CAN-2005-0202.dpatch:
Mailman/Cgi/private.py, true_path(): fix the removal of '..' and '.' from
private mail archive paths to prohibit path traversal (the former version
transformed ".....///" to "../") (closes: #294467)
(References: CAN-2005-0202)
* Tighten build-deps on dpatch. (closes: #291289)
* Update Czech debconf translation. (closes: #293002)
* Add Dutch debconf translation. (closes: #283973)
Files:
91fdedde9ada517bc94e52a29d8fa56a 651 mail optional mailman_2.1.5-6.dsc
bf85a3cb885618a9964a873fb769225e 182465 mail optional mailman_2.1.5-6.diff.gz
f30d18591db657a0c2870e54326a566c 6609034 mail optional mailman_2.1.5-6_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCC0YhQSseMYF6mWoRAn0FAJ91wD2djTv3KfETu6Cc3o/+WwjsKwCfX5jM
mkzVv05og/sDBHWI4mLFd50=
=+ZBW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
