Your message dated Tue, 08 Feb 2005 07:47:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294054: fixed in specimen 0.4.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2005 00:58:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 31 16:58:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CvmNa-00018o-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:58:54 -0800
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
j110wkXE030968
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
        Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:58:50 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j110wk5J030966;
        Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:58:46 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: specimen: ftbfs [sparc] configure: error: Library requirements
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:58:46 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: specimen
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

Specimen fails to build from source on sparc, apparently missing build
dependancies.  Duplicated on a sparc pbuilder.


checking whether pthreads work with -pthread... yes
checking for joinable pthread attribute... PTHREAD_CREATE_JOINABLE
checking if more special flags are required for pthreads... no
checking for cc_r... sparc-linux-gcc
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for gtk+-2.0 libxml-2.0 jack alsa samplerate sndfile phat... Package 
libxml-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libxml-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
No package 'libxml-2.0' found

configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 libxml-2.0 jack alsa 
samplerate sndfile phat) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH 
environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so 
pkg-config can find them.
make: *** [config.status] Error 1


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 294054-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Feb 2005 12:53:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 08 04:53:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CyUsA-0000xw-00; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 04:53:42 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CyUlz-0007al-00; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 07:47:19 -0500
From: Eduardo Marcel Macan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#294054: fixed in specimen 0.4.5-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 07:47:19 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: specimen
Source-Version: 0.4.5-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
specimen, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

specimen_0.4.5-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/specimen/specimen_0.4.5-2.diff.gz
specimen_0.4.5-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/specimen/specimen_0.4.5-2.dsc
specimen_0.4.5-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/specimen/specimen_0.4.5-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Eduardo Marcel Macan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated specimen package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  8 Feb 2005 10:08:52 -0200
Source: specimen
Binary: specimen
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eduardo Marcel Macan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Eduardo Marcel Macan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 specimen   - a MIDI controllable audio sampler for GNU/Linux systems
Closes: 294054
Changes: 
 specimen (0.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed build dependencies (closes: #294054)
Files: 
 4b992292b0e484e62bc6101c1435b853 747 sound optional specimen_0.4.5-2.dsc
 064d5157aa46c9ec4e60754d43043e3c 6734 sound optional specimen_0.4.5-2.diff.gz
 5e5955080426c199f7f541f94d9feb1c 85194 sound optional specimen_0.4.5-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCCLF4oUSye+uc2tURAmw8AJ4t9pIa/1Xlkrf3n2j3rziKCzWBgACfRJ8S
kq5eVVOsNYawljzSYKVsPBY=
=Jo5n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to