Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:41:27 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2003 08:07:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 11 03:07:47 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Q0e1-0005ZF-00; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 03:07:45 -0500
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3])
by smtp6.mindspring.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 19Q0e0-0007wq-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 04:07:44 -0400
Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20)
id 19Q0dz-0003D4-BM
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 01:07:43 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ksmp3play: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: configure test uses multiline
strings
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 01:07:43 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: ksmp3play
Version: 0.5.1-3
Severity: serious
>From my build log:
...
checking for sdl-config... /usr/bin/sdl-config
checking for SDL - version >= 1.1.5... no
*** Could not run SDL test program, checking why...
*** The test program compiled, but did not run. This
usually means
*** that the run-time linker is not finding SDL or
finding the wrong
*** version of SDL. If it is not finding SDL, you'll
need to set your
*** LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable, or edit
/etc/ld.so.conf to point
*** to the installed location Also, make sure you have
run ldconfig if that
*** is required on your system
***
*** If you have an old version installed, it is best to
remove it, although
*** you may also be able to get things to work by
modifying LD_LIBRARY_PATH
configure: error: *** SDL version 1.1.5 not found!
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1
The config.log file says:
...
configure:1317: checking for sdl-config
configure:1352: checking for SDL - version >= 1.1.5
configure:1443: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -I/usr/include/SDL -D_REENTRANT
conftest.c -L/usr/lib -lSDL -lpthread 1>&5
configure:1425:14: missing terminating " character
configure: In function `main':
configure:1426: error: parse error before "minimum"
configure:1426: error: stray '\' in program
configure:1426:18: missing terminating " character
configure:1428:14: missing terminating " character
...
else
{
printf("\n*** 'sdl-config --version' returned %d.%d.%d, but the
minimum version\n", 1, 2,
5);
printf("*** of SDL required is %d.%d.%d. If sdl-config is correct,
then it is\n", major, minor, micro);
printf("*** best to upgrade to the required version.\n");
printf("*** If sdl-config was wrong, set the environment variable
SDL_CONFIG\n");
printf("*** to point to the correct copy of sdl-config, and remove
the file\n");
printf("*** config.cache before re-running configure\n");
return 1;
}
}
...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 196997-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2005 18:41:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 06 10:41:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CxrLh-0006ho-00; Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:41:33 -0800
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 2DA3826BCE; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:41:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2B0BB4EE6A; Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:41:27 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 18:41:27 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD,
SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9
This package has been removed from Debian because it didn't have a
maintainer, is buggy and because there are other, similar applications
in the archive.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
