Your message dated Sat, 05 Feb 2005 05:10:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293574 acknowledged by developer (This isn't a bug)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2005 13:17:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 04 05:17:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from goofy.fi.upm.es [138.100.8.23] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cx3LQ-0002y5-00; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 05:17:56 -0800
Received: from babel.ls.fi.upm.es (babel.ls.fi.upm.es [138.100.12.136])
 by relay.fi.upm.es (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30875)
 with ESMTPS id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:16:43 +0100 (MET)
Received: from egallego by babel.ls.fi.upm.es with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1Cx3OC-0005LF-3u; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:20:48 +0100
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 14:20:48 +0100
From: Emilio Gallego <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Clearsilver can't enter testing.
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: clearsilver
Severity: normal

Hi!

I'm wondering why clearsilver hasn't entered testing, bjorn page says:

    * clearsilver has no old version in testing (trying to add, not update)
    * Adding clearsilver makes 1 non-depending packages uninstallable on alpha: 
clearsilver-dev

and grep-excuses:

clearsilver (- to 0.9.13-1)
    Maintainer: Jesus Climent
    18 days old (needed 10 days)
    clearsilver-dev/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    clearsilver-dev/arm unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    clearsilver-dev/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    clearsilver-dev/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    clearsilver-dev/ia64 unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    clearsilver-dev/m68k unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    clearsilver-dev/mips unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    clearsilver-dev/mipsel unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    clearsilver-dev/powerpc unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    clearsilver-dev/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    clearsilver-dev/sparc unsatisfiable Depends: clearsilver1
    Valid candidate

Humm, maybe they need a hint, I don't know, but it would be nice to solve
this so we can have trac in testing.

Regards and keep the good work,

Emilio

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293574-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2005 04:10:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 04 20:10:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from stress.telefonica.net (tnetsmtp1.mail.isp) [213.4.129.135] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CxHGi-0003Du-00; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 20:10:00 -0800
Received: from [192.168.1.110] ([217.172.66.230]) by
          tnetsmtp1.mail.isp (terra.es) with ESMTP id IBF7KM00.61B for
          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 5 Feb 2005 05:09:58 +0100 
Subject: Re: Bug#293574 acknowledged by developer (This isn't a bug)
From: Emilio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Gallego Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 05:10:24 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Sorry, I didn't see the upload.

Regards, Emilio


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to