Your message dated Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:47:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292226: fixed in crack-attack 1.1.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 20:47:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 12:47:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de [132.230.30.150]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtXar-0002TK-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:47:21 -0800
Received: from pcpool08.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de ([132.230.30.158])
by pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 1CtXat-00022a-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:47:23 +0100
Received: from brl by pcpool08.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de with local (Exim 3.35
#1 (Debian))
id 1CtXat-00005Z-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:47:23 +0100
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:47:23 +0100
From: "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: crack-attack
Version: 1.1.10-2
Severity: serious
The following manpages say they are only distributeable under
the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this
license:
crack-attack.6.gz
This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to
debian-devel and debian-legal:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg00499.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00262.html
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 292226-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2005 12:53:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 04 04:53:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cx2xJ-0008GP-00; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 04:53:02 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cx2rg-0002ee-00; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:47:12 -0500
From: Chris Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#292226: fixed in crack-attack 1.1.10-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:47:12 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: crack-attack
Source-Version: 1.1.10-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
crack-attack, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
crack-attack_1.1.10-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/crack-attack/crack-attack_1.1.10-3.diff.gz
crack-attack_1.1.10-3.dsc
to pool/main/c/crack-attack/crack-attack_1.1.10-3.dsc
crack-attack_1.1.10-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/crack-attack/crack-attack_1.1.10-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated crack-attack package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:13:12 +0000
Source: crack-attack
Binary: crack-attack
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Chris Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Chris Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
crack-attack - multiplayer OpenGL puzzle game like "Tetris Attack"
Closes: 288825 292226
Changes:
crack-attack (1.1.10-3) unstable; urgency=high
.
* High-urgency upload for sarge-targetted RC bugfix.
* Add a proper copy of the GFDL to debian/copyright to document the
license status of the manpage, and add a reference to this file from
the manpage per GFDL section 6, thanks Steve Langasek
(Closes: #292226)
* Game.h: remove #define max(a,b) to allow building on gcc-4.0/amd64,
thanks Andreas Jochens (Closes: #288825)
Files:
def454122039609420cb685357f64f0e 642 games optional crack-attack_1.1.10-3.dsc
06569aa1adf3c2f35226a0f7c7bc5111 13963 games optional
crack-attack_1.1.10-3.diff.gz
5e061a3408249f994a7f8ef3b2b870e1 549076 games optional
crack-attack_1.1.10-3_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCAhXdRi6ArLfYbg8RAlC0AJ93cEvtFTN8bYvq9mmco8MjB7Sz7ACffrqU
R8LhdVP9ocx57Av+u6fodoQ=
=QNZZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
