More communication on the issue.

--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:27:56PM +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
>  || On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:49:34 +0100
>  || Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> 
>  >> The old source name was gnuradio, now it has changed into
>  >> gnuradio-core. The upstream refers to gnuradio sources in the CVS as
>  >> 0.9. So this may lead to confusion. I (and the upstream) prefer to use
>  >> the name gnuradio-core. I guess this is a very valid reason. Renaming
>  >> will create confusion, for sure.
> 
>  jeroen> The source package name is hardly ever exposed to users -- it's the
>  jeroen> binary package names that matter (the names for the .deb's).
> 
>  jeroen> For example, what user knows that the mysql package is from the
>  jeroen> 'mysql-dfsg' source package?
> 
>  jeroen> But whatever, you can change the source name if you want to, it makes
>  jeroen> sense if there are now multiple gnuradio-* source packages.
> 
> The single old gnuradio is now split into many source packages. Only the core
> library is built from gnuradio-core. There are now many gr-* sources, which
> I have packaged. I need to file ITPs and upload them.
> 
> Your argument makes sense. But if the old gnuradio packages are
> removed, then it makes my life a lot easier.

Ah, ok. Then indeed, uploading gnomeradio-core makes sense.

>  jeroen> If your new package supplies the same .deb's as the gnuradio source 
> (and
>  jeroen> why shouldn't it?), then this removal will happen semi-automagically.
> 
> Some of the binary package names change, to reflect the new library names
> (for instance libgnuradio-core instead of libgnuradio), but some of them
> are the same as old (python-gnuradio). I was confused how thing will be if
> I upload a new version with a new source and binary names into the archive.
> The best solution to me seemed to be removal of the old packages.

Ok. Yes, it should be removed, but only after a replacement is uploaded
-- of course, on the binary level, I assume some upgrade path is thought
out for people upgrading?

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl



--- End Message ---

-- 
    Ramakrishnan                (http://www.hackGNU.org/)
    Use Free Software          (http://www.gnu.org/)

Reply via email to