Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:13:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292863: FTBFS: 1.1.3-3 fails to build on all arches since
november, vcl-gtk-rtl-fix.diff doesn't apply.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2005 17:36:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 30 09:36:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CvIzX-0004hX-00; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 09:36:07 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0909.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 28A942400137;
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:35:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-65-234.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr
[82.126.133.234])
by mwinf0909.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 65A28240013B;
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:35:35 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from luther by pegasos with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1CvIwI-0002oX-Cv; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:32:46 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: 1.1.3-3 fails to build on all arches since november,
vcl-gtk-rtl-fix.diff doesn't apply.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:32:46 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS.
As said, openoffice.org is currently FTBFS on all arches where it has been
attempted (powerpc, sparc and s390, i think, as you can see here :
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=openoffice.org&ver=1.1.3-3&arch=powerpc&stamp=1103668978&file=log&as=raw
Error seems to be :
1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
vcl/unx/gtk/window/gtkframe.cxx.rej
Testing patch vcl-gtk-rtl-fix.diff failed. at ooo-build/patches/apply.pl line
44.
And altough it seems like 1.1.3-4 may have fixed it since it it touches the
above .diff, no build has been attempted since then, and it is almost a month
now.
This problem may be known already, i just file it here for documentation
purpose, and in case you were not aware of it, which i doubt.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages openoffice.org depends on:
ii dictionaries-common [openof 0.24.5 Common utilities for spelling dict
ii openoffice.org-bin 1.1.2dfsg1-3 OpenOffice.org office suite binary
ii openoffice.org-debian-files 1.1.2-5+1 Debian specific parts of OpenOffic
ii openoffice.org-l10n-en [ope 1.1.2-5 English (US) language package for
ii openoffice.org-l10n-fr [ope 1.1.2-5 French language package for OpenOf
ii ttf-opensymbol 1.1.3-4 The OpenSymbol TrueType font
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 292863-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2005 18:14:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 30 10:14:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CvJad-000073-00; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:14:27 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2005 18:13:55 -0000
Received: from dsl-213-023-036-120.arcor-ip.net (EHLO localhost) (213.23.36.120)
by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 30 Jan 2005 19:13:55 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1545045
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3D2AE1B74D; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:13:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:13:13 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#292863: FTBFS: 1.1.3-3 fails to build on all arches since
november, vcl-gtk-rtl-fix.diff doesn't apply.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zi0sgQQBxRFxMTsj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Organization: The Debian Project
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--Zi0sgQQBxRFxMTsj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 1.1.3-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS.
WTF? 1.1.3-3 isn't anywhere anymore.
> As said, openoffice.org is currently FTBFS on all arches where it has been
> attempted (powerpc, sparc and s390, i think, as you can see here :=20
Nope. The current version is 1.1.3-4.
> And altough it seems like 1.1.3-4 may have fixed it since it it touches t=
he
> above .diff, no build has been attempted since then, and it is almost a m=
onth
> now.
It has been attempted and the buildd machine crashded during build and
it hasn't been requeued. A question to the buildd admin had no effect.
And I simply don not care anymore, we need a new upload anyhow...
Complain at the buildd admin. No bug here.
> This problem may be known already, i just file it here for documentation
> purpose, and in case you were not aware of it, which i doubt.
Err? It was fixed with -4, so we were aware..
Closing.
Gr=FC=DFe/Regards,
Ren=E9
--=20
.''`. Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
=20
--Zi0sgQQBxRFxMTsj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB/SO4+FmQsCSK63MRAuzcAJ44o1L6kPh6L+sXPtoxN7PtmTj88ACggOTq
dDYVyRJhM15a28LHO27+4go=
=KTTK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Zi0sgQQBxRFxMTsj--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
