Your message dated Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:45:15 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line setserial no longer in base
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2005 17:02:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 21 09:02:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from winfree.gag.com [192.133.104.8] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Cs2BD-0008MO-00; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:02:39 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED1DC222;
        Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:02:38 -0700 (MST)
Received: from winfree.gag.com ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (winfree [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 18199-02; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:02:28 -0700 (MST)
Received: from rover.gag.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6CFC0B6;
        Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:02:28 -0700 (MST)
Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 0C97A82324; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:02:28 -0700 (MST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: downgrade and move setserial
From: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:02:27 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at gag.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious

The 'setserial' package remains problematic on many systems.  In the worst 
cases, having the package installed with the default debconf choice taken 
will cause a hard system crash on boot.  There seems to be general agreement 
that this package, while still useful on some systems in some cases, is no 
longer an appropriate package to have as part of Debian's 'base' install.

Please downgrade the priority of setserial from 'important' to 'extra'.  I
would accept 'optional', but the "it can crash your system if you don't know
what you're doing" aspect makes me suggest 'extra' as more appropriate.  A
change to a priority lower than 'standard' is release-critical for sarge.

As supporting evidence for this request, I offer the changelog of debootstrap
version 0.2.41, and the message thread it references attached to bug #212646.
The change in debootstrap was necessary but not sufficient to solve the 
problem, as 'important' priority causes tasksel, et al, to install setserial.
We *must* fix this for sarge release!

Please also move the setserial package from 'base' to 'comm'.  This is not 
absolutely required, but once the priority is lowered it would be less
confusing to our users if setserial were no longer part of the 'base' section.

Bdale

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 261873-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2005 21:45:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 26 13:45:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CtuyY-0004Zl-00; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:45:22 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
        by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29373550A
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:45:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-82-135-4-31.mnet-online.de [82.135.4.31])
        by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1578F42787
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:45:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) 
[+prerelease])
        id 1CtuyR-0008J0-HV
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:45:15 +0100
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:45:15 +0100
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: setserial no longer in base
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi,

this bug is now fixed:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ alicia setserial
| setserial is in section 'comm' at priority 'extra'

Thanks for reporting it.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to